These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34662710)

  • 21. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews or meta-analyses in nursing field in China.
    Jin YH; Ma ET; Gao WJ; Hua W; Dou HY
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Feb; 20(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 24580977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Epidemiology, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China.
    Shi C; Zhu L; Wang X; Qin C; Xu Q; Tian J
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):689-700. PubMed ID: 25532885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Yang M; Jiang L; Wang A; Xu G
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 28004476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. PRISMA and AMSTAR show systematic reviews on health literacy and cancer screening are of good quality.
    Sharma S; Oremus M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():123-131. PubMed ID: 29654821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - A systematic review.
    Sun X; Wang D; Wang M; Li H; Liu B
    Nurs Open; 2021 May; 8(3):1489-1500. PubMed ID: 33465288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Meningioma systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an assessment of reporting and methodological quality.
    George AM; Gupta S; Keshwara SM; Mustafa MA; Gillespie CS; Richardson GE; Steele AC; Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH; Dirven L; Marson AG; Islim AI; Jenkinson MD; Millward CP
    Br J Neurosurg; 2022 Dec; 36(6):678-685. PubMed ID: 36263847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Characteristics, methodological, and reporting quality of scoping reviews published in nursing journals: A systematic review.
    Woo BFY; Tam WWS; Williams MY; Ow Yong JQY; Cheong ZY; Ong YC; Poon SN; Goh YS
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2023 Jul; 55(4):874-885. PubMed ID: 36494752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reporting and methodologic evaluation of meta-analyses published in the anesthesia literature according to AMSTAR and PRISMA checklists: a preliminary study.
    Oh JH; Shin WJ; Park S; Chung JS
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2017 Aug; 70(4):446-455. PubMed ID: 28794841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality assessment and factor analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis.
    Liu D; Jin J; Tian J; Yang K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0120911. PubMed ID: 25905713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quality of meta-analyses in major leading orthopedics journals: A systematic review.
    Zhi X; Zhang Z; Cui J; Zhai X; Chen X; Su J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 103(8):1141-1146. PubMed ID: 28928047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Completeness of reporting for systematic reviews of point-of-care ultrasound: a meta-research study.
    Prager R; Pratte M; Guy A; Bala S; Bachar R; Kim DJ; Millington S; Salameh JP; McGrath TA; McInnes MD
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2021 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 33785511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is quality and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in high impact radiology journals associated with citation rates?
    van der Pol CB; McInnes MD; Petrcich W; Tunis AS; Hanna R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119892. PubMed ID: 25775455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on direct oral anticoagulants in the past 5 years.
    Eshaghpour A; Li A; Javidan AP; Chen N; Yang S; Crowther MA
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2020 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 32493834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality.
    Fleming PS; Koletsi D; Seehra J; Pandis N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 24709031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
    Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Quality of Literature Search Reporting in Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature (1998-2021).
    Norling B; Edgerton Z; Bakker C; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2023 May; 209(5):837-843. PubMed ID: 36661375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR.
    Yuan M; Wu J; Austin RE; Lista F; Ahmad J
    Aesthet Surg J Open Forum; 2021 Sep; 3(3):ojab020. PubMed ID: 34240051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating the Characteristics, Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture for Low Back Pain by Using the Veritas Plot.
    Huang F; Qiu M; Zhao S; Dai L; Xu Y; Yang Y; Lu L; Guo R; Tian Q; Fan Z; Wu S
    J Pain Res; 2020; 13():2633-2652. PubMed ID: 33116806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.