These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3466375)

  • 21. Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine.
    Danforth RA; Clark DE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Feb; 89(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 10673663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of collimator size of a dental X-ray unit on image contrast.
    Falk A; Lindhe JE; Rohlin M; Nilsson M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 10490742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiation absorbed doses at radiographic examination of third molars.
    Rehnmark-Larsson S; Stenström B; Julin P; Richter S
    Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(5):189-201. PubMed ID: 6960504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Absorbed radiation dose during lateral cephalometric radiography: comparison of screen-film systems and field-size combinations.
    Tsiklakis K; Donta-Bakoyanni C; Tassopoulou M; Kamenopoulou V
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 11314319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does the lead apron and collar always reduce radiation dose?
    Nortje CJ; Harris AM; Lackovic KP; Wood RE
    SADJ; 2001 Nov; 56(11):502-4. PubMed ID: 11885424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the efficacy and technical accuracy of different rectangular collimators for intraoral radiography.
    Zhang W; Abramovitch K; Thames W; Leon IL; Colosi DC; Goren AD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e22-8. PubMed ID: 19464209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Kerma area product (KAP) and scatter measurements for intraoral X-ray machines using three different types of round collimation compared with rectangular beam limiter.
    Magill D; Ngo NJH; Felice MA; Mupparapu M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180183. PubMed ID: 30346798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pediatric Phantom Dosimetry Evaluation of a New Rectangular Collimator.
    Martinez A; Yepes JF; Jones JE; Wong P; Johnson KB; Canady S; Tang Q
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2023 Jan; 90(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 37106534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intraoral radiographs: A comparison of dose and risk reduction with collimation and thyroid shielding.
    Johnson KB; Ludlow JB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Oct; 151(10):726-734. PubMed ID: 32979952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An in vivo evaluation of the diagnostic quality ultra-speed versus insight intraoral dental film.
    Schiff T; Solomon BE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):50-7. PubMed ID: 15558090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Determination of absorbed doses of radiation during lateral cephalometric radiography].
    Patsakas AJ; Donta CN; Tsiklakis KD
    Hell Period Stomat Gnathopathoprosopike Cheir; 1989 Jun; 4(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 2640655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bitewing radiography dosimetry of a stationary intraoral tomosynthesis imaging system.
    Johnson KB; LaPrade JC; Platin E; Broome AM; Ludlow JB; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Dec; 130(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 32665203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Determination of absorbed doses of radiation in patients during periapical dental radiography].
    Donta-Bakoyianni CN
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1990 Dec; 44(6):403-11. PubMed ID: 2130351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The use of a thyroid collar for intraoral radiography].
    Schmidt K; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1998 Jun; 105(6):209-12. PubMed ID: 11928141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
    Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A method of dosimetry for synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy using radiochromic films of different sensitivity.
    Crosbie JC; Svalbe I; Midgley SM; Yagi N; Rogers PA; Lewis RA
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6861-77. PubMed ID: 19001701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technical Performance of Universal and Enhanced Intraoral Imaging Rectangular Collimators.
    Johnson KB; Mauriello SM; Ludlow JB; Platin E
    J Dent Hyg; 2015 Aug; 89(4):238-46. PubMed ID: 26304948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Radiation dose to the head, and particularly to the lens of the eye, during tomography with EMI scanner].
    Nemec HW; Roth J
    Rofo; 1976 Jun; 124(6):526-30. PubMed ID: 133915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficiency of the cervical lead shield during intraoral radiography.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Shlezinger T; Segal P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Dec; 62(6):732-6. PubMed ID: 3467297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Intraoral radiography: qualitative study].
    Freyche S; Vazquez L
    Swiss Dent J; 2023 Feb; 133(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 36723432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.