256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34663819)
1. Incorporating functional priors improves polygenic prediction accuracy in UK Biobank and 23andMe data sets.
Márquez-Luna C; Gazal S; Loh PR; Kim SS; Furlotte N; Auton A; ; Price AL
Nat Commun; 2021 Oct; 12(1):6052. PubMed ID: 34663819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Leveraging functional genomic annotations and genome coverage to improve polygenic prediction of complex traits within and between ancestries.
Zheng Z; Liu S; Sidorenko J; Wang Y; Lin T; Yengo L; Turley P; Ani A; Wang R; Nolte IM; Snieder H; ; Yang J; Wray NR; Goddard ME; Visscher PM; Zeng J
Nat Genet; 2024 May; 56(5):767-777. PubMed ID: 38689000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved polygenic prediction by Bayesian multiple regression on summary statistics.
Lloyd-Jones LR; Zeng J; Sidorenko J; Yengo L; Moser G; Kemper KE; Wang H; Zheng Z; Magi R; Esko T; Metspalu A; Wray NR; Goddard ME; Yang J; Visscher PM
Nat Commun; 2019 Nov; 10(1):5086. PubMed ID: 31704910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accurate estimation of SNP-heritability from biobank-scale data irrespective of genetic architecture.
Hou K; Burch KS; Majumdar A; Shi H; Mancuso N; Wu Y; Sankararaman S; Pasaniuc B
Nat Genet; 2019 Aug; 51(8):1244-1251. PubMed ID: 31358995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving GWAS discovery and genomic prediction accuracy in biobank data.
Orliac EJ; Trejo Banos D; Ojavee SE; Läll K; Mägi R; Visscher PM; Robinson MR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(31):e2121279119. PubMed ID: 35905320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficient polygenic risk scores for biobank scale data by exploiting phenotypes from inferred relatives.
Truong B; Zhou X; Shin J; Li J; van der Werf JHJ; Le TD; Lee SH
Nat Commun; 2020 Jun; 11(1):3074. PubMed ID: 32555176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiethnic polygenic risk scores improve risk prediction in diverse populations.
Márquez-Luna C; Loh PR; ; ; Price AL
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 41(8):811-823. PubMed ID: 29110330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Leveraging Polygenic Functional Enrichment to Improve GWAS Power.
Kichaev G; Bhatia G; Loh PR; Gazal S; Burch K; Freund MK; Schoech A; Pasaniuc B; Price AL
Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Jan; 104(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 30595370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors.
Ge T; Chen CY; Ni Y; Feng YA; Smoller JW
Nat Commun; 2019 Apr; 10(1):1776. PubMed ID: 30992449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Portability of 245 polygenic scores when derived from the UK Biobank and applied to 9 ancestry groups from the same cohort.
Privé F; Aschard H; Carmi S; Folkersen L; Hoggart C; O'Reilly PF; Vilhjálmsson BJ
Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Jan; 109(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 34995502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Controlling for background genetic effects using polygenic scores improves the power of genome-wide association studies.
Bennett D; O'Shea D; Ferguson J; Morris D; Seoighe C
Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):19571. PubMed ID: 34599249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved genetic prediction of complex traits from individual-level data or summary statistics.
Zhang Q; Privé F; Vilhjálmsson B; Speed D
Nat Commun; 2021 Jul; 12(1):4192. PubMed ID: 34234142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genome-wide association study of multisite chronic pain in UK Biobank.
Johnston KJA; Adams MJ; Nicholl BI; Ward J; Strawbridge RJ; Ferguson A; McIntosh AM; Bailey MES; Smith DJ
PLoS Genet; 2019 Jun; 15(6):e1008164. PubMed ID: 31194737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Making the Most of Clumping and Thresholding for Polygenic Scores.
Privé F; Vilhjálmsson BJ; Aschard H; Blum MGB
Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Dec; 105(6):1213-1221. PubMed ID: 31761295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of polygenic prediction methodology within a reference-standardized framework.
Pain O; Glanville KP; Hagenaars SP; Selzam S; Fürtjes AE; Gaspar HA; Coleman JRI; Rimfeld K; Breen G; Plomin R; Folkersen L; Lewis CM
PLoS Genet; 2021 May; 17(5):e1009021. PubMed ID: 33945532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significant sparse polygenic risk scores across 813 traits in UK Biobank.
Tanigawa Y; Qian J; Venkataraman G; Justesen JM; Li R; Tibshirani R; Hastie T; Rivas MA
PLoS Genet; 2022 Mar; 18(3):e1010105. PubMed ID: 35324888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From Genotype to Phenotype: Polygenic Prediction of Complex Human Traits.
Raben TG; Lello L; Widen E; Hsu SDH
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2467():421-446. PubMed ID: 35451785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incorporating functional annotation with bilevel continuous shrinkage for polygenic risk prediction.
Zhuang Y; Kim NY; Fritsche LG; Mukherjee B; Lee S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 25(1):65. PubMed ID: 38336614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accurate and Scalable Construction of Polygenic Scores in Large Biobank Data Sets.
Yang S; Zhou X
Am J Hum Genet; 2020 May; 106(5):679-693. PubMed ID: 32330416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variable prediction accuracy of polygenic scores within an ancestry group.
Mostafavi H; Harpak A; Agarwal I; Conley D; Pritchard JK; Przeworski M
Elife; 2020 Jan; 9():. PubMed ID: 31999256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
