192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34664653)
1. Monte Carlo Simulation Approaches for Quantitative Bias Analysis: A Tutorial.
Banack HR; Hayes-Larson E; Mayeda ER
Epidemiol Rev; 2022 Jan; 43(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 34664653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accounting for Misclassification and Selection Bias in Estimating Effectiveness of Self-managed Medication Abortion.
Jayaweera RT; Bradshaw PT; Gerdts C; Egwuatu I; Grosso B; Kristianingrum I; Nmezi S; Zurbriggen R; Ahern J; Moseson H
Epidemiology; 2023 Jan; 34(1):140-149. PubMed ID: 36455250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in dynamic treatment regimes.
Rose EJ; Moodie EEM; Shortreed SM
Biom J; 2023 Jun; 65(5):e2100359. PubMed ID: 37017498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How Do Propensity Score Methods Measure Up in the Presence of Measurement Error? A Monte Carlo Study.
RodrÃguez De Gil P; Bellara AP; Lanehart RE; Lee RS; Kim ES; Kromrey JD
Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):520-32. PubMed ID: 26610250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validating an approach to overcome the immeasurable time bias in cohort studies: a real-world example and Monte Carlo simulation study.
Oh IS; Jeong HE; Lee H; Filion KB; Noh Y; Shin JY
Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 52(5):1534-1544. PubMed ID: 37172269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accounting for response misclassification and covariate measurement error improves power and reduces bias in epidemiologic studies.
Cheng D; Branscum AJ; Stamey JD
Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):562-7. PubMed ID: 20538200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Markov chain Monte Carlo: an introduction for epidemiologists.
Hamra G; MacLehose R; Richardson D
Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 42(2):627-34. PubMed ID: 23569196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods.
Morris TP; White IR; Crowther MJ
Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(11):2074-2102. PubMed ID: 30652356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating misclassification error: a closer look at cross-validation based methods.
Ounpraseuth S; Lensing SY; Spencer HJ; Kodell RL
BMC Res Notes; 2012 Nov; 5():656. PubMed ID: 23190936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation Models of Misclassification Error for Single Thresholds of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Due to Assay Bias and Imprecision.
Lyon AW; Kavsak PA; Lyon OA; Worster A; Lyon ME
Clin Chem; 2017 Feb; 63(2):585-592. PubMed ID: 27974385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Errors associated with metabolic control analysis. Application Of Monte-Carlo simulation of experimental data.
Ainscow EK; Brand MD
J Theor Biol; 1998 Sep; 194(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 9778435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative Bias Analysis of the Association between Occupational Radiation Exposure and Ischemic Heart Disease Mortality in UK Nuclear Workers.
de Vocht F; Martin RM; Hidajat M; Wakeford R
Radiat Res; 2021 Dec; 196(6):574-586. PubMed ID: 34370860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. It's not all about residual confounding: a plea for QBA for epidemiologic researchers and educators.
Fox MP; Adrien N; van Smeden M; Suarez E
Am J Epidemiol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38754869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Propensity scores used for analysis of cluster randomized trials with selection bias: a simulation study.
Leyrat C; Caille A; Donner A; Giraudeau B
Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(19):3357-72. PubMed ID: 23553813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SAS and R code for probabilistic quantitative bias analysis for misclassified binary variables and binary unmeasured confounders.
Fox MP; MacLehose RF; Lash TL
Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 52(5):1624-1633. PubMed ID: 37141446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Many are called, but few are chosen. Feature selection and error estimation in high dimensional spaces.
Schulerud H; Albregtsen F
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Feb; 73(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 14757253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis and Bayesian analysis of smoking as an unmeasured confounder in a study of silica and lung cancer.
Steenland K; Greenland S
Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 160(4):384-92. PubMed ID: 15286024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Approaches to addressing missing values, measurement error, and confounding in epidemiologic studies.
van Smeden M; Penning de Vries BBL; Nab L; Groenwold RHH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 131():89-100. PubMed ID: 33176189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
