BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34664653)

  • 21. A method for energy window optimization for quantitative tasks that includes the effects of model-mismatch on bias: application to Y-90 bremsstrahlung SPECT imaging.
    Rong X; Du Y; Frey EC
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3711-25. PubMed ID: 22617760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of Bayesian and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P
    Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(18):2887-2901. PubMed ID: 28386994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Simultaneous adjustment of uncontrolled confounding, selection bias and misclassification in multiple-bias modelling.
    Brendel P; Torres A; Arah OA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 52(4):1220-1230. PubMed ID: 36718093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Calculating partial expected value of perfect information via Monte Carlo sampling algorithms.
    Brennan A; Kharroubi S; O'hagan A; Chilcott J
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(4):448-70. PubMed ID: 17761960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lower confidence bounds for prediction accuracy in high dimensions via AROHIL Monte Carlo.
    Dobbin KK; Cooke S
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Nov; 27(22):3129-34. PubMed ID: 21965820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigating the impact of selection bias in dose-response analyses of preventive interventions.
    McGowan HM; Nix RL; Murphy SA; Bierman KL;
    Prev Sci; 2010 Sep; 11(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 20180151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of recall errors and of selection bias in epidemiologic studies of mobile phone use and cancer risk.
    Vrijheid M; Deltour I; Krewski D; Sanchez M; Cardis E
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 16(4):371-84. PubMed ID: 16773122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simulation as a Tool for Teaching and Learning Epidemiologic Methods.
    Rudolph JE; Fox MP; Naimi AI
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 May; 190(5):900-907. PubMed ID: 33083814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Terminating observation within matched pairs of subjects in a matched cohort analysis: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Sutradhar R; Baxter NN; Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(2):294-304. PubMed ID: 26278725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The problem of controlling for imperfectly measured confounders on dissimilar populations: a database simulation study.
    Schonberger RB; Gilbertsen T; Dai F
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Apr; 28(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 23962461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multilevel and Quasi Monte Carlo Methods for the Calculation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information.
    Fang W; Wang Z; Giles MB; Jackson CH; Welton NJ; Andrieu C; Thom H
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):168-181. PubMed ID: 34231446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conditional validation sampling for consistent risk estimation with binary outcome data subject to misclassification.
    Gravel CA; Farrell PJ; Krewski D
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Feb; 28(2):227-233. PubMed ID: 30746841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Monte Carlo Strategies for Selecting Parameter Values in Simulation Experiments.
    Leigh JW; Bryant D
    Syst Biol; 2015 Sep; 64(5):741-51. PubMed ID: 26012871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative bias analysis for study and grant planning.
    Fox MP; Lash TL
    Ann Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 43():32-36. PubMed ID: 32113733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A dose point kernel database using GATE Monte Carlo simulation toolkit for nuclear medicine applications: comparison with other Monte Carlo codes.
    Papadimitroulas P; Loudos G; Nikiforidis GC; Kagadis GC
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5238-47. PubMed ID: 22894448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing linear regression, beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression at recovering average difference measures in a two sample design.
    Meaney C; Moineddin R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jan; 14():14. PubMed ID: 24461057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Propensity score methods for estimating relative risks in cluster randomized trials with low-incidence binary outcomes and selection bias.
    Leyrat C; Caille A; Donner A; Giraudeau B
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(20):3556-75. PubMed ID: 24771662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. MPEXS-DNA, a new GPU-based Monte Carlo simulator for track structures and radiation chemistry at subcellular scale.
    Okada S; Murakami K; Incerti S; Amako K; Sasaki T
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1483-1500. PubMed ID: 30593679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. DeepBeam: a machine learning framework for tuning the primary electron beam of the PRIMO Monte Carlo software.
    Tabor Z; Kabat D; Waligórski MPR
    Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):124. PubMed ID: 34187495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.