191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34665034)
1. Machine Learning for Workflow Applications in Screening Mammography: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hickman SE; Woitek R; Le EPV; Im YR; Mouritsen Luxhøj C; Aviles-Rivero AI; Baxter GC; MacKay JW; Gilbert FJ
Radiology; 2022 Jan; 302(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 34665034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammography diagnosis of breast cancer screening through machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu J; Lei J; Ou Y; Zhao Y; Tuo X; Zhang B; Shen M
Clin Exp Med; 2023 Oct; 23(6):2341-2356. PubMed ID: 36242643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Raya-Povedano JL; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34904872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance.
Cozzi A; Magni V; Zanardo M; Schiaffino S; Sardanelli F
Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):568-581. PubMed ID: 34904875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of an Artificial Intelligence System for Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammograms from BreastScreen Norway.
Larsen M; Olstad CF; Lee CI; Hovda T; Hoff SR; Martiniussen MA; Mikalsen KØ; Lund-Hanssen H; Solli HS; Silberhorn M; Sulheim ÅØ; Auensen S; Nygård JF; Hofvind S
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230375. PubMed ID: 38597784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms.
Schaffter T; Buist DSM; Lee CI; Nikulin Y; Ribli D; Guan Y; Lotter W; Jie Z; Du H; Wang S; Feng J; Feng M; Kim HE; Albiol F; Albiol A; Morrell S; Wojna Z; Ahsen ME; Asif U; Jimeno Yepes A; Yohanandan S; Rabinovici-Cohen S; Yi D; Hoff B; Yu T; Chaibub Neto E; Rubin DL; Lindholm P; Margolies LR; McBride RB; Rothstein JH; Sieh W; Ben-Ari R; Harrer S; Trister A; Friend S; Norman T; Sahiner B; Strand F; Guinney J; Stolovitzky G; ; Mackey L; Cahoon J; Shen L; Sohn JH; Trivedi H; Shen Y; Buturovic L; Pereira JC; Cardoso JS; Castro E; Kalleberg KT; Pelka O; Nedjar I; Geras KJ; Nensa F; Goan E; Koitka S; Caballero L; Cox DD; Krishnaswamy P; Pandey G; Friedrich CM; Perrin D; Fookes C; Shi B; Cardoso Negrie G; Kawczynski M; Cho K; Khoo CS; Lo JY; Sorensen AG; Jung H
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Mar; 3(3):e200265. PubMed ID: 32119094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Deep Learning Mammography-based Model for Improved Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Yala A; Lehman C; Schuster T; Portnoi T; Barzilay R
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 31063083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammography Breast Cancer Screening Triage Using Deep Learning: A UK Retrospective Study.
Hickman SE; Payne NR; Black RT; Huang Y; Priest AN; Hudson S; Kasmai B; Juette A; Nanaa M; Aniq MI; Sienko A; Gilbert FJ
Radiology; 2023 Nov; 309(2):e231173. PubMed ID: 37987665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting Breast Cancer by Applying Deep Learning to Linked Health Records and Mammograms.
Akselrod-Ballin A; Chorev M; Shoshan Y; Spiro A; Hazan A; Melamed R; Barkan E; Herzel E; Naor S; Karavani E; Koren G; Goldschmidt Y; Shalev V; Rosen-Zvi M; Guindy M
Radiology; 2019 Aug; 292(2):331-342. PubMed ID: 31210611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Deep Learning Model to Triage Screening Mammograms: A Simulation Study.
Yala A; Schuster T; Miles R; Barzilay R; Lehman C
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 31385754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support Using Deep Learning on Breast Cancer Screening Interpretation with Single-View Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Pinto MC; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Pedersen K; Hofvind S; Wicklein J; Kappler S; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):529-536. PubMed ID: 34227882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deep-Learning-Based Semantic Labeling for 2D Mammography and Comparison of Complexity for Machine Learning Tasks.
Yi PH; Lin A; Wei J; Yu AC; Sair HI; Hui FK; Hager GD; Harvey SC
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31197559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved Cancer Detection Using Artificial Intelligence: a Retrospective Evaluation of Missed Cancers on Mammography.
Watanabe AT; Lim V; Vu HX; Chim R; Weise E; Liu J; Bradley WG; Comstock CE
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):625-637. PubMed ID: 31011956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Noble M; Bruening W; Uhl S; Schoelles K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jun; 279(6):881-90. PubMed ID: 19023581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a Deep Learning Risk Score and Standard Mammographic Density Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Dembrower K; Liu Y; Azizpour H; Eklund M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Strand F
Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 31845842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Detecting Breast Cancer in the Diagnostic Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Ko MJ; Park DA; Kim SH; Ko ES; Shin KH; Lim W; Kwak BS; Chang JM
Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1240-1252. PubMed ID: 34047504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. External validation of a publicly available computer assisted diagnostic tool for mammographic mass lesions with two high prevalence research datasets.
Benndorf M; Burnside ES; Herda C; Langer M; Kotter E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4987-96. PubMed ID: 26233224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
