267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34665780)
1. Visual percepts evoked with an intracortical 96-channel microelectrode array inserted in human occipital cortex.
Fernández E; Alfaro A; Soto-Sánchez C; Gonzalez-Lopez P; Lozano AM; Peña S; Grima MD; Rodil A; Gómez B; Chen X; Roelfsema PR; Rolston JD; Davis TS; Normann RA
J Clin Invest; 2021 Dec; 131(23):. PubMed ID: 34665780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex.
Schmidt EM; Bak MJ; Hambrecht FT; Kufta CV; O'Rourke DK; Vallabhanath P
Brain; 1996 Apr; 119 ( Pt 2)():507-22. PubMed ID: 8800945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time stability and connectivity analysis with an intracortical 96-channel microelectrode array inserted in human visual cortex.
Grani F; Soto-Sanchez C; Farfan FD; Alfaro A; Grima MD; Rodil Doblado A; Fernández E
J Neural Eng; 2022 Jul; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35817011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic Stimulation of Visual Cortex Produces Form Vision in Sighted and Blind Humans.
Beauchamp MS; Oswalt D; Sun P; Foster BL; Magnotti JF; Niketeghad S; Pouratian N; Bosking WH; Yoshor D
Cell; 2020 May; 181(4):774-783.e5. PubMed ID: 32413298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eye movements and the perceived location of phosphenes generated by intracranial primary visual cortex stimulation in the blind.
Caspi A; Barry MP; Patel UK; Salas MA; Dorn JD; Roy A; Niketeghad S; Greenberg RJ; Pouratian N
Brain Stimul; 2021; 14(4):851-860. PubMed ID: 33991713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phosphenes produced by electrical stimulation of human occipital cortex, and their application to the development of a prosthesis for the blind.
Dobelle WH; Mladejovsky MG
J Physiol; 1974 Dec; 243(2):553-76. PubMed ID: 4449074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chronic stability of a neuroprosthesis comprising multiple adjacent Utah arrays in monkeys.
Chen X; Wang F; Kooijmans R; Klink PC; Boehler C; Asplund M; Roelfsema PR
J Neural Eng; 2023 Jun; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 37386891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial and temporal characteristics of V1 microstimulation during chronic implantation of a microelectrode array in a behaving macaque.
Davis TS; Parker RA; House PA; Bagley E; Wendelken S; Normann RA; Greger B
J Neural Eng; 2012 Dec; 9(6):065003. PubMed ID: 23186948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrical Stimulation of Visual Cortex: Relevance for the Development of Visual Cortical Prosthetics.
Bosking WH; Beauchamp MS; Yoshor D
Annu Rev Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 3():141-166. PubMed ID: 28753382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple factors may influence the performance of a visual prosthesis based on intracortical microstimulation: nonhuman primate behavioural experimentation.
Torab K; Davis TS; Warren DJ; House PA; Normann RA; Greger B
J Neural Eng; 2011 Jun; 8(3):035001. PubMed ID: 21593550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods and perceptual thresholds for short-term electrical stimulation of human retina with microelectrode arrays.
Rizzo JF; Wyatt J; Loewenstein J; Kelly S; Shire D
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Dec; 44(12):5355-61. PubMed ID: 14638738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brightness as a function of current amplitude in human retinal electrical stimulation.
Greenwald SH; Horsager A; Humayun MS; Greenberg RJ; McMahon MJ; Fine I
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 50(11):5017-25. PubMed ID: 19608533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sequential epiretinal stimulation improves discrimination in simple shape discrimination tasks only.
Christie B; Sadeghi R; Kartha A; Caspi A; Tenore FV; Klatzky RL; Dagnelie G; Billings S
J Neural Eng; 2022 Jun; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35613043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrical stimulation thresholds differ between V1 and V2.
Meikle SJ; Allison-Walker TJ; Hagan MA; Price NSC; Wong YT
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38082908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting visual sensitivity in retinal prosthesis patients.
Horsager A; Greenwald SH; Weiland JD; Humayun MS; Greenberg RJ; McMahon MJ; Boynton GM; Fine I
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 50(4):1483-91. PubMed ID: 19098313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of cortical visual prostheses microelectrode array function. Description of behavioral feline model.
Ivanova ME; Gordeev SA; Ortmann VV; Baziyan BKh
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3371-4. PubMed ID: 19163432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microstimulation of visual cortex to restore vision.
Tehovnik EJ; Slocum WM; Smirnakis SM; Tolias AS
Prog Brain Res; 2009; 175():347-75. PubMed ID: 19660667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of extraocular electrodes for a retinal prosthesis using evoked potentials in cat visual cortex.
Chowdhury V; Morley JW; Coroneo MT
J Clin Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 12(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 16051097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of synchronous versus asynchronous electrical stimulation in artificial vision.
Moleirinho S; Whalen AJ; Fried SI; Pezaris JS
J Neural Eng; 2021 Apr; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 33900206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cortical visual prostheses: from microstimulation to functional percept.
Najarpour Foroushani A; Pack CC; Sawan M
J Neural Eng; 2018 Apr; 15(2):021005. PubMed ID: 29350199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
