138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34666701)
21. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Performance of Screening Ultrasonography as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography in Women Across the Spectrum of Breast Cancer Risk.
Lee JM; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Smith RA; Henderson LM; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
JAMA Intern Med; 2019 May; 179(5):658-667. PubMed ID: 30882843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ultrasound screening of contralateral breast after surgery for breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Chung SY; Chang JM; Cho N; Han W; Moon WK
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 25458226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ultrasound and Clinical Characteristics of False-negative Results in Mammography Screening of Dense Breasts.
Pu H; Peng J; Xu F; Liu N; Wang F; Huang X; Jia Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(4):317-325. PubMed ID: 32229176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analysis of mammographic breast density in a group of screening chinese women and breast cancer patients.
Liu J; Liu PF; Li JN; Qing C; Ji Y; Hao XS; Zhang XN
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(15):6411-4. PubMed ID: 25124634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance of hand-held whole-breast ultrasound based on BI-RADS in women with mammographically negative dense breast.
Youk JH; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Kwak JY; Son EJ
Eur Radiol; 2011 Apr; 21(4):667-75. PubMed ID: 20853108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Breast-density assessment with hand-held ultrasound: A novel biomarker to assess breast cancer risk and to tailor screening?
Sanabria SJ; Goksel O; Martini K; Forte S; Frauenfelder T; Kubik-Huch RA; Rominger MB
Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3165-3175. PubMed ID: 29556766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women.
Yu X; Hu G; Zhang Z; Qiu F; Shao X; Wang X; Zhan H; Chen Y; Deng Y; Huang J
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():450. PubMed ID: 27401536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency for breast cancer in Chinese women using mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and different combinations of these imaging modalities.
Shao H; Li B; Zhang X; Xiong Z; Liu Y; Tang G
J Xray Sci Technol; 2013; 21(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 23694915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Targeted Ultrasound of an Indeterminate Breast Lesion on Mammography: When Does It Influence Management?
Sohail S; Masroor I; Afzal S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Aug; 25(8):564-7. PubMed ID: 26305300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Review of Supplemental Screening Ultrasound for Breast Cancer: Certain Populations of Women with Dense Breast Tissue May Benefit.
Burkett BJ; Hanemann CW
Acad Radiol; 2016 Dec; 23(12):1604-1609. PubMed ID: 27374700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Magnetic resonance imaging and breast ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammographic screening in high-risk patients.
Le-Petross HT; Shetty MK
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21782116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sonographic characteristics of breast cancers detected by supplemental screening US: Comparison with breast cancers seen on screening mammography.
Cho N; Moon WK; Chang JM; Yi A; Koo HR; Han BK
Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):969-76. PubMed ID: 20942730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The diagnostic performance of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound and mammography in symptomatic outpatient women: a multicenter, cross-sectional study in China.
Lin X; Jia M; Zhou X; Bao L; Chen Y; Liu P; Feng R; Zhang X; Zhu L; Wang H; Zhu Y; Tang G; Feng W; Li A; Qiao Y
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):947-957. PubMed ID: 32852589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interpretation Time Using a Concurrent-Read Computer-Aided Detection System for Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breast Tissue.
Jiang Y; Inciardi MF; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):452-461. PubMed ID: 29792747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Whole-breast US following mammography and breast MRI in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: can it be more than just a guidance tool for biopsy?
Park YJ; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Kim EK; Yoon JH
Clin Radiol; 2017 May; 72(5):425.e1-425.e7. PubMed ID: 27712905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Supplemental Screening Breast US in Women with Negative Mammographic Findings: Effect of Routine Axillary Scanning.
Lee SH; Yi A; Jang MJ; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK
Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):830-837. PubMed ID: 29083988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Breast cancer screening.
Freimanis RI; Yacobozzi M
N C Med J; 2014; 75(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 24663133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
