These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34668037)

  • 21. Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: a review of 440 consecutive patients.
    Lista F; Tutino R; Khan A; Ahmad J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 23584627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Muscle-splitting, subglandular, and partial submuscular augmentation mammoplasties: a 12-year retrospective analysis of 2026 primary cases.
    Khan UD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 37(2):290-302. PubMed ID: 23354762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Subglandular-to-Subpectoral Conversion with Mastopexy: The Four-Step Approach.
    Ono MT; Karner BM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Feb; 149(2):209e-215e. PubMed ID: 35077413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reverse-Muscle Sling Reduces Complications in Revisional Mastopexy-Augmentation.
    Valente DS
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Oct; 42(5):1202-1212. PubMed ID: 29926124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Simultaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastopexy Utilizing an Inferiorly Based Adipodermal Flap: Our Experience with Prepectoral and Subpectoral Techniques.
    Mosharrafa AM; Mosharrafa TM; Zannis VJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 May; 145(5):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 32332524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment.
    Médard de Chardon V; Balaguer T; Chignon-Sicard B; Lebreton E
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 20224340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discussion: Revision Incidence after Immediate Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using National Real-World Data.
    Haddock NT; Teotia SS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):703-704. PubMed ID: 36989338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mastopexy using de-epithelialised dermoglandular flaps: a case series for maximal volume conservation following breast implants removal.
    Khan UD; Naseem S; Rafiq S
    Eur J Med Res; 2022 Aug; 27(1):159. PubMed ID: 36030247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Single Staged Mastopexy With Autologous Fat Grafting: An Alternative to Augmentation Mastopexy With Implants.
    Walters J; Bourn L; Tessler O; Patterson C; Khoobehi K
    Aesthet Surg J; 2020 Mar; 40(4):NP152-NP158. PubMed ID: 31750877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Subfascial periareolar augmentation mammaplasty.
    Stoff-Khalili MA; Scholze R; Morgan WR; Metcalf JD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1280-8; discussion 1289-91. PubMed ID: 15457050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Impact of breast dimension in one-stage augmentation mastopexies on implant selection: review of 103 consecutive breast augmentations with nanotextured silicone implants].
    Lam MC; Vorhold J; Pech T; Wefers N; Kalff JC; Walgenbach KJ
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2021 Apr; 53(2):130-143. PubMed ID: 33860491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. One stage mastopexy augmentation in the ptotic patient. The superiorly based dermal flap for autologous reinforcement of the inferior pole.
    Ross GL
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Sep; 68(9):1248-54. PubMed ID: 26049611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A single-centre, retrospective proof-of-concept review of salvage of infected or exposed implant breast reconstructions with explantation and one-stage free flap replacement.
    Bramhall RJ; Hernan I; Harris PA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Feb; 71(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 29122498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficacy of neopectoral pocket in revisionary breast surgery.
    Maxwell GP; Birchenough SA; Gabriel A
    Aesthet Surg J; 2009; 29(5):379-85. PubMed ID: 19825466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Considerations of previous augmentation in subsequent breast reconstruction.
    Spear SL; Clemens MW; Dayan JH
    Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 19083539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Invited Discussion on: The Role of High-Resolution Ultrasonography in Elucidating Features of Breast Implants in Symptomatic Patients after Implant-based Augmentation Mammoplasty.
    Hafezi F; Jahanshahi S
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 46(3):1143-1144. PubMed ID: 35006297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Periareolar Augmentation-Mastopexy.
    Austin RE; Saheb-Al-Zamani M; Lista F; Ahmad J
    Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Aug; 39(9):953-965. PubMed ID: 31056674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A guide to breast implants for the non-breast specialist.
    Harvey KL; Clark SE
    Womens Health (Lond); 2016 Nov; 12(6):533-537. PubMed ID: 29334026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of outcomes in breast reconstructions combining lower abdominal free flaps and permanent implants.
    Roehl KR; Baumann DP; Chevray PM; Chang DW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):349-357. PubMed ID: 20375765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Commentary on: Inferior and Medially Based Breast Parenchymal Rotation Flap: A New Mastopexy Technique for Replacing Breast Volume After Breast Implant Explantation.
    Hammond DC
    Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Nov; 43(12):1468-1470. PubMed ID: 37561013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.