218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34668306)
1. Digital assessment of marginal accuracy in ceramic crowns fabricated with different marginal finish line configurations.
Faruqi S; Ganji KK; Bandela V; Nagarajappa AK; Mohamed RN; Ahmed MA; Farhan M; Alwakid WN; Al-Hammad KAS; Alam MK
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jul; 34(5):789-795. PubMed ID: 34668306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique.
Rizonaki M; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P; Depla L; Boone M; De Coster PJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):890-898. PubMed ID: 33541816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A micro-computed tomography analysis of internal and marginal fits of fixed partial dentures: Effect of preparation finish line designs on monolithic zirconia and heat-pressed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate.
Elsherbini M; Sakrana AA; Amin RA; Diaa M; Özcan M; Al-Zordk W
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):90-99. PubMed ID: 36718906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a CAD/CAM zirconia-based ceramic crown system.
Baig MR; Al-Tarakemah Y; Kasim NHA; Omar R
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(3):319–329. PubMed ID: 33616567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of a CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Porcelain Laminate Veneer System.
Baig MR; Akbar AA; Sabti MY; Behbehani Z
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):502-511. PubMed ID: 34608712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An In Vitro Comparison of Zirconia and Hybrid Ceramic Crowns With Heavy Chamfer and Shoulder Finish Lines.
Yadav P; Sharma V; Paliwal J; Meena KK; Madaan R; Gurjar B
Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e33940. PubMed ID: 36819334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal Fit Comparison of CAD/CAM Crowns Milled from Two Different Materials.
Azarbal A; Azarbal M; Engelmeier RL; Kunkel TC
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):421-428. PubMed ID: 29143397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal Fit Evaluation of CAD/CAM All Ceramic Crowns Obtained by Two Digital Workflows: An In Vitro Study Using Micro-CT Technology.
Duqum IS; Brenes C; Mendonca G; Carneiro TAPN; Cooper LF
J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1037-1043. PubMed ID: 31621973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparations with two different finish lines.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Brufau-de Barberà M; Gomes-Azevedo S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 22372886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CAD/CAM system influence marginal fit of different ceramic types?
de Almeida IG; Antunes DB; Braun NX; Restani A; Straioto FG; Galhano GA
Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(1):127-129. PubMed ID: 30900671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal fit of monolithic versus layered zirconia crowns assessed with 2 marginal gap methods.
Fasih P; Tavakolizadeh S; Sedaghat Monfared M; Sofi-Mahmudi A; Yari A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):250.e1-250.e7. PubMed ID: 37451899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Accuracy of Fit of Metal, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Different Manufacturing Techniques.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Quran FA; AlJalam SA; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 30719780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Monolithic Ceramic and Metal-Ceramic Crowns.
Freire Y; Gonzalo E; Lopez-Suarez C; Suarez MJ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 28152246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
