150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34669764)
21. Low-Level Speech Recognition of Children with Hearing Aids.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Miller S; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Dunn A; Battles J; Neumann S; Manning J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Apr; 33(4):196-205. PubMed ID: 34758503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of Different Hearing Aid Prescriptions for Children.
Marriage JE; Vickers DA; Baer T; Glasberg BR; Moore BCJ
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 28691934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures.
Byrne D; Dillon H; Ching T; Katsch R; Keidser G
J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jan; 12(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 11214977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The preferred number of channels (one, two, or four) in NAL-NL1 prescribed wide dynamic range compression (WDRC) devices.
Keidser G; Grant F
Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):516-27. PubMed ID: 11770673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Remote or in-clinic? The effect of service delivery mode on hearing aid output: study protocol for a double-blinded, randomised trial in adults with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
Lett C; Welch D; Dobson R
Trials; 2024 Apr; 25(1):256. PubMed ID: 38610038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing-aid fitting: predicted speech intelligibility and loudness.
Ching TY; Johnson EE; Hou S; Dillon H; Zhang V; Burns L; van Buynder P; Wong A; Flynn C
Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52 Suppl 2(0 2):S29-38. PubMed ID: 24350692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
Boothroyd A
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Development and preliminary verification of a Mandarin-based hearing-aid fitting strategy.
Lai YH; Liu TC; Li PC; Shih WT; Young ST
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80831. PubMed ID: 24278326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study.
Kelsall D; Lupo J; Biever A
Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL).
Bishop CE; Hamadain E; Galster JA; Johnson MF; Spankovich C; Windmill I
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):941-949. PubMed ID: 29130442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure.
Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Walters D; Levitt H
Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):177-93. PubMed ID: 10890726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition.
Perry TT; Nelson PB
Am J Audiol; 2022 Jun; 31(2):305-321. PubMed ID: 35316099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Task-Dependent Effects of Signal Audibility for Processing Speech: Comparing Performance With NAL-NL2 and DSL v5 Hearing Aid Prescriptions at Threshold and at Suprathreshold Levels in 9- to 17-Year-Olds With Hearing Loss.
Pittman AL; Stewart EC
Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231177509. PubMed ID: 37254534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Ching TY; Incerti P; Hill M
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 14770014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Characteristics of hearing aid fittings in infants and young children.
McCreery RW; Bentler RA; Roush PA
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):701-10. PubMed ID: 23575463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimising hearing aid output to paediatric prescriptive targets improves outcomes in children.
Amri NA; Quar TK; Chong FY; Bagatto M
Int J Audiol; 2022 Nov; 61(11):924-931. PubMed ID: 34859745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prescribed clinician-fit versus as-worn coupler gain in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers.
Humes LE; Barlow NN; Garner CB; Wilson DL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):879-92. PubMed ID: 11386475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
Seeto A; Searchfield GD
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
