These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34669764)

  • 41. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Manufacturer predicted and measured REAR values in adult hearing aid fitting: accuracy and clinical usefulness.
    Aarts NL; Caffee CS
    Int J Audiol; 2005 May; 44(5):293-301. PubMed ID: 16028792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Does probe-tube verification of real-ear hearing aid amplification characteristics improve outcomes in adult hearing aid users? A protocol for a systematic review.
    Almufarrij I; Munro KJ; Dillon H
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jul; 10(7):e038113. PubMed ID: 32690533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips.
    Kim H; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prescribed real-ear and achieved real-life differences in children's hearing aids adjusted according to the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions.
    Ching TY; Scollie SD; Dillon H; Seewald R; Britton L; Steinberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S16-25. PubMed ID: 20109083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Middle ear electromagnetic semi-implantable hearing device: results of the phase II SOUNDTEC direct system clinical trial.
    Hough JV; Matthews P; Wood MW; Dyer RK
    Otol Neurotol; 2002 Nov; 23(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 12438853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of Hearing Aid Manufacturers' Software-Derived Fittings to DSL v5.0 Pediatric Targets.
    Folkeard P; Bagatto M; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):354-362. PubMed ID: 31639078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Transitioning hearing aid users with severe and profound loss to a new gain/frequency response: benefit, perception, and acceptance.
    Convery E; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 21545769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A cross-over, double-blind comparison of the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children with mild to moderately severe hearing loss.
    Ching TY; Scollie SD; Dillon H; Seewald R
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S4-15. PubMed ID: 20109088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
    Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fitting hearing aids to adults using prescriptive methods: an evidence-based review of effectiveness.
    Mueller HG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005; 16(7):448-60. PubMed ID: 16295232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effects of receiver placement on probe microphone, performance, and subjective measures with open canal hearing instruments.
    Alworth LN; Plyler PN; Reber MB; Johnstone PM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):249-66. PubMed ID: 20388451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear?
    Ching TY; Psarros C; Hill M; Dillon H; Incerti P
    Ear Hear; 2001 Oct; 22(5):365-80. PubMed ID: 11605945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Right-Ear Advantage for Unaided and Aided Speech Perception in Noise in Older Adults.
    Behtani L; Fuente A; Ianiszewski A; Osman RA
    J Int Adv Otol; 2021 Mar; 17(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 33893780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. User preference and reliability of bilateral hearing aid gain adjustments.
    Hornsby BW; Mueller HG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Feb; 19(2):158-70. PubMed ID: 18669129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Interactions of hearing aid compression release time and fitting formula: effects on speech acoustics.
    Ellison JC; Harris FP; Muller T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003; 14(2):59-71. PubMed ID: 12830842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparative analysis of the NAL-NL2 and DSL v5.0a prescription procedures in the adaptation of hearing aids in the elderly.
    Bertozzo MC; Blasca WQ
    Codas; 2019 Aug; 31(4):e20180171. PubMed ID: 31433039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Experiments with classroom FM amplification.
    Boothroyd A; Iglehart F
    Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):202-17. PubMed ID: 9657595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: I. Speech perception outcomes.
    Bentler R; Palmer C; Mueller HG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Mar; 17(3):179-89. PubMed ID: 16646278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.
    Moore BC; Baer T; Ives DT; Marriage J; Salorio-Corbetto M
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 26928003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.