308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34671946)
1. Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.
Hall R; Medina-Lara A; Hamilton W; Spencer AE
Patient; 2022 May; 15(3):269-285. PubMed ID: 34671946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stakeholders' preferences for the design and delivery of virtual care services: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Vo LK; Allen MJ; Cunich M; Thillainadesan J; McPhail SM; Sharma P; Wallis S; McGowan K; Carter HE
Soc Sci Med; 2024 Jan; 340():116459. PubMed ID: 38048738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.
Ozdemir S; Lee JJ; Chaudhry I; Ocampo RRQ
Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 34085205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990-2013.
Mansfield C; Tangka FK; Ekwueme DU; Smith JL; Guy GP; Li C; Hauber AB
Prev Chronic Dis; 2016 Feb; 13():E27. PubMed ID: 26916898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attributes in stated preference elicitation studies on colorectal cancer screening and their relative importance for decision-making among screenees: a systematic review.
Brinkmann M; Fricke LM; Diedrich L; Robra BP; Krauth C; Dreier M
Health Econ Rev; 2022 Sep; 12(1):49. PubMed ID: 36136248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patients' Preferences for Outcome, Process and Cost Attributes in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.
Bien DR; Danner M; Vennedey V; Civello D; Evers SM; Hiligsmann M
Patient; 2017 Oct; 10(5):553-565. PubMed ID: 28364387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Systematic Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis Studies in People with Multiple Sclerosis.
Webb EJD; Meads D; Eskyte I; King N; Dracup N; Chataway J; Ford HL; Marti J; Pavitt SH; Schmierer K; Manzano A
Patient; 2018 Aug; 11(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 29313265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Eliciting Preferences in Dentistry with Multiattribute Stated Preference Methods: A Systematic Review.
Barber S; Pavitt S; Khambay B; Bekker H; Meads D
JDR Clin Trans Res; 2018 Oct; 3(4):326-335. PubMed ID: 30931788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer.
Howard K; Salkeld G
Value Health; 2009; 12(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 18657102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A discrete choice experiment to understand public preferences and priorities for risk-stratified bowel cancer screening programmes in the UK.
Dennison RA; Thomas CV; Morris S; Usher-Smith JA
Prev Med; 2023 Dec; 177():107786. PubMed ID: 37984646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.
Kleij KS; Tangermann U; Amelung VE; Krauth C
BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jul; 17(1):476. PubMed ID: 28697796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Public Preferences for Determining Eligibility for Screening in Risk-Stratified Cancer Screening Programs: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
Dennison RA; Taylor LC; Morris S; Boscott RA; Harrison H; Moorthie SA; Rossi SH; Stewart GD; Usher-Smith JA
Med Decis Making; 2023 Apr; 43(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 36786399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Individual Preferences for Child and Adolescent Vaccine Attributes: A Systematic Review of the Stated Preference Literature.
Michaels-Igbokwe C; MacDonald S; Currie GR
Patient; 2017 Dec; 10(6):687-700. PubMed ID: 28474295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing stated preferences for colorectal cancer screening: a critical systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Wortley S; Wong G; Kieu A; Howard K
Patient; 2014; 7(3):271-82. PubMed ID: 24652475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Role of Attribute Screening and Choice Set Formation in Health Discrete Choice Experiments: Modeling the Impact of Benefit and Risk Attributes.
Veldwijk J; Swait JD
Value Health; 2022 Aug; 25(8):1416-1427. PubMed ID: 35599111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data? The role of model complexity in a discrete choice experiment about colorectal cancer screening.
Huls SPI; de Bekker-Grob EW
Soc Sci Med; 2022 Dec; 315():115530. PubMed ID: 36434890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patients' preferences for the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Tünneßen M; Hiligsmann M; Stock S; Vennedey V
J Med Econ; 2020 Jun; 23(6):546-556. PubMed ID: 32011209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Vaccine preferences driving vaccine-decision making of different target groups: a systematic review of choice-based experiments.
Diks ME; Hiligsmann M; van der Putten IM
BMC Infect Dis; 2021 Aug; 21(1):879. PubMed ID: 34454441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stakeholder Engagement in Designing Attributes for a Discrete Choice Experiment With Policy Implications: An Example of 2 Swiss Studies on Healthcare Delivery.
Föhn Z; Nicolet A; Marti J; Kaufmann C; Balthasar A
Value Health; 2023 Jun; 26(6):925-933. PubMed ID: 36646277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
