These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34672390)

  • 1. Mendelian randomization in the multivariate general linear model framework.
    Allman PH; Aban I; Long DM; Patki A; MacKenzie T; Irvin MR; Lange LA; Lange E; Cutter G; Tiwari HK
    Genet Epidemiol; 2022 Feb; 46(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 34672390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel Mendelian randomization method with binary risk factor and outcome.
    Allman PH; Aban I; Long DM; Bridges SL; Srinivasasainagendra V; MacKenzie T; Cutter G; Tiwari HK
    Genet Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 45(5):549-560. PubMed ID: 33998053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the instrumental inequalities in simulated mendelian randomization analyses with coarsened exposures.
    Diemer EW; Shi J; Hernan MA; Swanson SA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2024 May; 39(5):491-499. PubMed ID: 38819552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR-BOIL: Causal inference in one-sample Mendelian randomization for binary outcome with integrated likelihood method.
    Shi D; Wang Y; Zhang Z; Cao Y; Hu YQ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 47(4):332-357. PubMed ID: 36808763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving bias and coverage in instrumental variable analysis with weak instruments for continuous and binary outcomes.
    Burgess S; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1582-600. PubMed ID: 22374818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-fitted instrument: A blueprint for one-sample Mendelian randomization.
    Denault WRP; Bohlin J; Page CM; Burgess S; Jugessur A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Aug; 18(8):e1010268. PubMed ID: 36037248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.
    Liu Z; Ye T; Sun B; Schooling M; Tchetgen ET
    Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35950778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods.
    Burgess S; Dudbridge F; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1880-906. PubMed ID: 26661904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On Mendelian randomization analysis of case-control study.
    Zhang H; Qin J; Berndt SI; Albanes D; Deng L; Gail MH; Yu K
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):380-391. PubMed ID: 31625599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian randomization.
    Davies NM; von Hinke Kessler Scholder S; Farbmacher H; Burgess S; Windmeijer F; Smith GD
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):454-68. PubMed ID: 25382280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption.
    Hartwig FP; Davey Smith G; Bowden J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1985-1998. PubMed ID: 29040600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
    Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing concordance of instrumental variable effects in generalized linear models with application to Mendelian randomization.
    Dai JY; Chan KC; Hsu L
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):3986-4007. PubMed ID: 24863158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. simmrd: An open-source tool to perform simulations in Mendelian randomization.
    Lorincz-Comi N; Yang Y; Zhu X
    Genet Epidemiol; 2024 Mar; 48(2):59-73. PubMed ID: 38263619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Weak-instrument robust tests in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization.
    Wang S; Kang H
    Biometrics; 2022 Dec; 78(4):1699-1713. PubMed ID: 34213007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic.
    Bowden J; Del Greco M F; Minelli C; Davey Smith G; Sheehan NA; Thompson JR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1961-1974. PubMed ID: 27616674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies.
    Harbord RM; Didelez V; Palmer TM; Meng S; Sterne JA; Sheehan NA
    Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(7):1246-58. PubMed ID: 23080538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Avoiding collider bias in Mendelian randomization when performing stratified analyses.
    Coscia C; Gill D; Benítez R; Pérez T; Malats N; Burgess S
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2022 Jul; 37(7):671-682. PubMed ID: 35639294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mendelian randomization using semiparametric linear transformation models.
    Huang YT
    Stat Med; 2020 Mar; 39(7):890-905. PubMed ID: 31879996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.