These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34673302)

  • 1. The selection balance: Contrasting value, proximity and priming in a multitarget foraging task.
    Tagu J; Kristjánsson Á
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104935. PubMed ID: 34673302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamics of attentional and oculomotor orienting in visual foraging tasks.
    Tagu J; Kristjánsson Á
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Feb; 75(2):260-276. PubMed ID: 32238034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks.
    Kristjánsson T; Thornton IM; Chetverikov A; Kristjánsson Á
    Cognition; 2020 Jan; 194():104032. PubMed ID: 31476612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual Foraging With Fingers and Eye Gaze.
    Jóhannesson ÓI; Thornton IM; Smith IJ; Chetverikov A; Kristjánsson Á
    Iperception; 2016 Mar; 7(2):2041669516637279. PubMed ID: 27433323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Target value and prevalence influence visual foraging in younger and older age.
    Wiegand I; Wolfe JM
    Vision Res; 2021 Sep; 186():87-102. PubMed ID: 34062375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eye movements during visual search for emotional faces in individuals with chronic headache.
    Schoth DE; Godwin HJ; Liversedge SP; Liossi C
    Eur J Pain; 2015 May; 19(5):722-32. PubMed ID: 25263515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
    Wolfe JM; Aizenman AM; Boettcher SE; Cain MS
    Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():50-9. PubMed ID: 26731644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye movements are not mandatorily preceded by the N2pc component.
    Talcott TN; Gaspelin N
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Jun; 58(6):e13821. PubMed ID: 33778965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prior target locations attract overt attention during search.
    Talcott TN; Gaspelin N
    Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104282. PubMed ID: 32387723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stable individual differences in strategies within, but not between, visual search tasks.
    Clarke AD; Irons JL; James W; Leber AB; Hunt AR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Feb; 75(2):289-296. PubMed ID: 32644016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Covert enaction at work: Recording the continuous movements of visuospatial attention to visible or imagined targets by means of Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials (SSVEPs).
    Gregori Grgič R; Calore E; de'Sperati C
    Cortex; 2016 Jan; 74():31-52. PubMed ID: 26615517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The attentional template in high and low similarity search: Optimal tuning or tuning to relations?
    Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104732. PubMed ID: 33862440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Foraging tempo: Human run patterns in multiple-target search are constrained by the rate of successive responses.
    Thornton IM; Nguyen TT; Kristjánsson Á
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Feb; 75(2):297-312. PubMed ID: 32933424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reward learning biases the direction of saccades.
    Liao MR; Anderson BA
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104145. PubMed ID: 31770659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Explicit eye movements failed to facilitate the precision of subsequent attentional localization.
    Hein E; Moore CM
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 197(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 19593553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian Statistical Model Is Able to Predict Target-by-Target Selection Behaviour in a Human Foraging Task.
    Clarke ADF; Hunt AR; Hughes AE
    Vision (Basel); 2022 Nov; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 36412647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gaze control in the cat: studies and modeling of the coupling between orienting eye and head movements in different behavioral tasks.
    Guitton D; Munoz DP; Galiana HL
    J Neurophysiol; 1990 Aug; 64(2):509-31. PubMed ID: 2213129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Space exploration in neglect.
    Karnath HO; Niemeier M; Dichgans J
    Brain; 1998 Dec; 121 ( Pt 12)():2357-67. PubMed ID: 9874486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian approximations to the theory of visual attention (TVA) in a foraging task.
    Le STT; Kristjánsson Á; MacInnes WJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Mar; 76(3):497-510. PubMed ID: 35361003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrasting attentional biases in a saccadic choice task.
    Jóhannesson ÓI; Kristjánsson Á; Tagu J
    Exp Brain Res; 2022 Jan; 240(1):173-187. PubMed ID: 34673989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.