These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34673786)
1. A new inertial navigation system for guiding implant placement. An in-vitro proof-of-concept study. Esteve-Pardo G; Esteve-Colomina L; Fernández E PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0255481. PubMed ID: 34673786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel mixed reality-guided dental implant placement navigation system based on virtual-actual registration. Fan X; Tao B; Tu P; Shen Y; Wu Y; Chen X Comput Biol Med; 2023 Nov; 166():107560. PubMed ID: 37847946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using CBCT-Derived Mucosa-Supported Stereolithographic Template. Sun Y; Luebbers HT; Agbaje JO; Schepers S; Politis C; Van Slycke S; Vrielinck L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17(5):862-70. PubMed ID: 24341829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I. Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of a dynamic navigation device on the accuracy of implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible: An in vitro study. Feng Y; Yao Y; Yang X J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 35000696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Verification of the usability of a navigation method in dental implant surgery: in vitro comparison with the stereolithographic surgical guide template method. Kang SH; Lee JW; Lim SH; Kim YH; Kim MK J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1530-5. PubMed ID: 24954760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of a laboratory-based computer implant guiding system. Barnea E; Alt I; Kolerman R; Nissan J Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e6-e10. PubMed ID: 20416521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors affecting accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides in edentulous mandibles. Ochi M; Kanazawa M; Sato D; Kasugai S; Hirano S; Minakuchi S Comput Biol Med; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1653-60. PubMed ID: 24209910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of virtually planned and CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery on plastic models. Pettersson A; Kero T; Söderberg R; Näsström K J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1472-8. PubMed ID: 24993374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective study of dynamic navigation system-assisted implant placement. Ma L; Ye M; Wu M; Chen X; Shen S BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):759. PubMed ID: 37838655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro model to evaluate the accuracy of guided surgery systems. Soares MM; Harari ND; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Conz MB; Vidigal GM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):824-31. PubMed ID: 22848884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides. Skjerven H; Riis UH; Herlofsson BB; Ellingsen JE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants. González Rueda JR; Galparsoro Catalán A; de Paz Hermoso VM; Riad Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato Mourelo J; Montero Martín J; Hernández Montero S BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):150. PubMed ID: 36918837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of virtually planned and conventionally placed implants in edentulous cadaver maxillae and mandibles: a preliminary report. Gillot L; Cannas B; Friberg B; Vrielinck L; Rohner D; Pettersson A J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):798-804. PubMed ID: 24993376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study. Kivovics M; Takács A; Pénzes D; Németh O; Mijiritsky E J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():104070. PubMed ID: 35183695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Accuracy of two different registration methods of dynamic navigation system for dental implant placement]. Ma FF; Wei T; Sun F; Ma Y Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 57(12):1225-1229. PubMed ID: 36509522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]