These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34673955)

  • 1. Electrophysiological Correlates of Social Decision-making: An EEG Investigation of a Modified Ultimatum Game.
    Moore M; Katsumi Y; Dolcos S; Dolcos F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 34(1):54-78. PubMed ID: 34673955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moral transgression modulates fairness considerations in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERP and EEG data.
    Chen T; Tang R; Yang X; Peng M; Cai M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 Jun; 188():1-11. PubMed ID: 36889599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resting-state network predicts the decision-making behaviors of the proposer during the ultimatum game.
    Li Y; Yang Q; Liu Y; Wang R; Zheng Y; Zhang Y; Si Y; Jiang L; Chen B; Peng Y; Wan F; Yu J; Yao D; Li F; He B; Xu P
    J Neural Eng; 2023 Sep; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 37659391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proposers' Economic Status Affects Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness.
    Zheng Y; Cheng X; Xu J; Zheng L; Li L; Yang G; Guo X
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():847. PubMed ID: 28611705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological Correlates of Racial In-group Bias in Observing Nonverbal Social Encounters.
    Katsumi Y; Dolcos F; Moore M; Bartholow BD; Fabiani M; Dolcos S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 32(1):167-186. PubMed ID: 31560271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-related changes in social decision-making: An electrophysiological analysis of unfairness evaluation in the Ultimatum Game.
    Fernandes C; Gonçalves AR; Pasion R; Ferreira-Santos F; Barbosa F; Martins IP; Marques-Teixeira J
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jan; 692():122-126. PubMed ID: 30391319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex and the money--How gender stereotypes modulate economic decision-making: An ERP study.
    Fabre EF; Causse M; Pesciarelli F; Cacciari C
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():221-32. PubMed ID: 26102185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.
    Wang A; Zhu L; Lyu D; Cai D; Ma Q; Jin J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 22(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 34374029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proportion offered in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games decreases with amount and social distance.
    Bechler C; Green L; Myerson J
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():149-55. PubMed ID: 25862989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
    Falco A; Albinet C; Rattat AC; Paul I; Fabre E
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 14(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30608613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hello handsome! Male's facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study.
    Ma Q; Qian D; Hu L; Wang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180459. PubMed ID: 28678888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The involvement of rTPJ in intention attribution during social decision making: A TMS study.
    Panico F; Ferrara A; Sagliano L; Trojano L
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Aug; 24(4):755-765. PubMed ID: 38689164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.
    Ma Q; Hu Y; Jiang S; Meng L
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():77. PubMed ID: 25805967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do different fairness contexts and facial emotions motivate 'irrational' social decision-making in major depression? An exploratory patient study.
    Radke S; Schäfer IC; Müller BW; de Bruijn ER
    Psychiatry Res; 2013 Dec; 210(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 23910237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Less Expectation, Less Pain: Low Wealth Alleviates Sense of Unfairness.
    Pei G; Jin J; Li T; Fang C
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():571952. PubMed ID: 33995167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examination of social decision making in patients with schizophrenia using ultimatum game.
    Patil VA; Jacob AA; Chacko DM; Chakrabarti D; Devi P; Thonse U; Kumar V; Varambally S; Venkatasubramanian G; Rao NP
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2020 Apr; 50():101937. PubMed ID: 32109802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to fairness norm violations in antisocial offenders.
    Mayer SV; Rauss K; Pourtois G; Jusyte A; Schönenberg M
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 269(6):731-740. PubMed ID: 29397410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.