These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34673989)

  • 1. Contrasting attentional biases in a saccadic choice task.
    Jóhannesson ÓI; Kristjánsson Á; Tagu J
    Exp Brain Res; 2022 Jan; 240(1):173-187. PubMed ID: 34673989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The presence of placeholders modulates the naso-temporal asymmetry in the remote distractor effect.
    Casteau S; Lodge R; Chalkley M; Walker R; Smith DT
    Cortex; 2021 Aug; 141():201-210. PubMed ID: 34089991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Naso-temporal asymmetry for signals invisible to the retinotectal pathway.
    Bompas A; Sterling T; Rafal RD; Sumner P
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):412-21. PubMed ID: 18480367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Violating the main sequence: asymmetries in saccadic peak velocities for saccades into the temporal versus nasal hemifields.
    Jóhannesson OI; Kristjánsson A
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 May; 227(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 23543106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The eyes prefer targets nearby fixation: Quantifying eccentricity-dependent attentional biases in oculomotor selection.
    van Heusden E; Olivers CNL; Donk M
    Vision Res; 2023 Apr; 205():108177. PubMed ID: 36669432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nasotemporal ERP differences: evidence for increased inhibition of temporal distractors.
    Huber-Huber C; Grubert A; Ansorge U; Eimer M
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2210-9. PubMed ID: 25589587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unconscious cueing effects in saccadic eye movements--facilitation and inhibition in temporal and nasal hemifield.
    Mulckhuyse M; Theeuwes J
    Vision Res; 2010 Mar; 50(6):606-13. PubMed ID: 20074582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human saccadic eye movements in the absence of the geniculocalcarine projection.
    Barbur JL; Forsyth PM; Findlay JM
    Brain; 1988 Feb; 111 ( Pt 1)():63-82. PubMed ID: 2835119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stronger attentional biases can be linked to higher reward rate in preferential choice.
    Zilker V
    Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105095. PubMed ID: 35468359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Altered saccadic targets when processing facial expressions under different attentional and stimulus conditions.
    Boutsen FA; Dvorak JD; Pulusu VK; Ross ED
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():150-160. PubMed ID: 28279711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. History effects in visual search for monsters: search times, choice biases, and liking.
    Chetverikov A; Kristjansson Á
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):402-12. PubMed ID: 25338539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Saccade performance in the nasal and temporal hemifields.
    Jóhannesson OI; Asgeirsson AG; Kristjánsson A
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 May; 219(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 22453719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recentering bias for temporal saccades only: Evidence from binocular recordings of eye movements.
    Tagu J; Doré-Mazars K; Vergne J; Lemoine-Lardennois C; Vergilino-Perez D
    J Vis; 2018 Jan; 18(1):10. PubMed ID: 29356814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional adjustment in priming tasks: control strategies depend on context.
    Tomat M; Wendt M; Jacobsen T
    Cogn Process; 2023 Feb; 24(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 36538134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reward learning biases the direction of saccades.
    Liao MR; Anderson BA
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104145. PubMed ID: 31770659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Priming of Visual Search Facilitates Attention Shifts: Evidence From Object-Substitution Masking.
    Kristjánsson Á
    Perception; 2016 Mar; 45(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 26562865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-term and long-term attentional biases to frequently encountered target features.
    Sha LZ; Remington RW; Jiang YV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1311-1322. PubMed ID: 28439792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. You see what you look for: Targets and distractors in visual search can cause opposing serial dependencies.
    Rafiei M; Chetverikov A; Hansmann-Roth S; Kristjánsson Á
    J Vis; 2021 Sep; 21(10):3. PubMed ID: 34468704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beer? Over here! Examining attentional bias towards alcoholic and appetitive stimuli in a visual search eye-tracking task.
    Pennington CR; Qureshi AW; Monk RL; Greenwood K; Heim D
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Dec; 236(12):3465-3476. PubMed ID: 31286155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Saccades require focal attention and are facilitated by a short-term memory system.
    McPeek RM; Maljkovic V; Nakayama K
    Vision Res; 1999 Apr; 39(8):1555-66. PubMed ID: 10343821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.