156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34675677)
1. Simple Hysterectomy for Patients with Stage IA2 Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Liu Q; Xu Y; He Y; Du Y; Zhang Q; Jia Y; Zheng A
Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():7823-7832. PubMed ID: 34675677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Less extensive surgery for patients with FIGO stage IA2 cervical cancer: A population-based study.
Du Y; Xu Y
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Feb; 51(2):102291. PubMed ID: 34915167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of long-term survival of total abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: Korean multicenter, retrospective analysis.
Kwon BS; Roh HJ; Lee S; Yang J; Song YJ; Lee SH; Kim KH; Suh DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):642-648. PubMed ID: 33041070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of survival outcomes between radio-chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy with postoperative standard therapy in patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: long-term oncological outcome analysis in 37 Chinese hospitals.
Liu P; Lin L; Kong Y; Huo Z; Zhu L; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
BMC Cancer; 2020 Mar; 20(1):189. PubMed ID: 32138718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Less radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review.
Wu J; Logue T; Kaplan SJ; Melamed A; Tergas AI; Khoury-Collado F; Hou JY; St Clair CM; Hershman DL; Wright JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 224(4):348-358.e5. PubMed ID: 33306971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Radical Abdominal Trachelectomy Versus Hysterectomy for Stage IA2-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
Guo J; Zhang Y; Chen X; Sun L; Chen K; Sheng X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):484-491. PubMed ID: 29908338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abdominal type B vs. type C radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A matched single center cohort report.
Wang L; Liu P; Duan H; Li P; Su G; Li W; Liang C; Chen C
Front Surg; 2023; 10():1166084. PubMed ID: 37123543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for stage IA cervical carcinoma: a survival analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Nasioudis D; Byrne M; Ko EM; Haggerty AF; Cory L; Giuntoli Ii RL; Kim SH; Latif NA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Aug; 31(8):1099-1103. PubMed ID: 33962993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study.
Alfonzo E; Wallin E; Ekdahl L; Staf C; Rådestad AF; Reynisson P; Stålberg K; Falconer H; Persson J; Dahm-Kähler P
Eur J Cancer; 2019 Jul; 116():169-177. PubMed ID: 31200323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study.
Uppal S; Gehrig PA; Peng K; Bixel KL; Matsuo K; Vetter MH; Davidson BA; Cisa MP; Lees BF; Brunette LL; Tucker K; Stuart Staley A; Gotlieb WH; Holloway RW; Essel KG; Holman LL; Goldfeld E; Olawaiye A; Rose SL
J Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 38(10):1030-1040. PubMed ID: 32031867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.
Wang W; Chu HJ; Shang CL; Gong X; Liu TY; Zhao YH; Huang JM; Yao SZ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1264-73. PubMed ID: 27643649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Lu A; Zhao H; Zhan X; Duan H; Li P; Zhao W; Yao J; Li D; Jiang H; Liu M; Bin X; Lang J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Feb; 305(2):449-458. PubMed ID: 34406459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of uterine corpus invasion on prognosis in stage IA2-IIB cervical cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
He F; Li W; Liu P; Kang S; Sun L; Zhao H; Chen X; Yin L; Wang L; Chen J; Fan H; Li P; Yang H; Wang F; Chen C
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 32467057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival Outcomes of Patients With Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Who Undergo Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Versus Radiochemotherapy.
Li Z; Yang Q; Guo J; Liang G; Duan H; Wang S; Hao M; Liang W; Li D; Zhan X; Xie Q; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():933755. PubMed ID: 35875125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
