BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34675677)

  • 21. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
    Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Class II versus Class III radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: an observational study in a tertiary center.
    Ditto A; Martinelli F; Ramondino S; Vullo SL; Carcangiu M; Haeusler E; Mariani L; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):883-90. PubMed ID: 24613739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does Radical Hysterectomy for Clinically Apparent Stage II Endometrial Cancer Affect Risk of Local Recurrence?
    Lennox GK; Clark M; Zigras T; Rouzbahman M; Han G; Bernardini MQ; Gien LT
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 May; 43(5):564-570. PubMed ID: 33412305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.
    Rodriguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Saenz J; Isla DO; Rendon Pereira GJ; Odetto D; Martinelli F; Villoslada V; Zapardiel I; Trujillo LM; Perez M; Hernandez M; Saadi JM; Raspagliesi F; Valdivia H; Siegrist J; Fu S; Hernandez Nava M; Echeverry L; Noll F; Ditto A; Lopez A; Hernandez A; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Apr; 31(4):504-511. PubMed ID: 33504547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Postoperative radiotherapy following inadvertent simple hysterectomy versus radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma.
    Sharma DN; Rath GK; Kumar S; Bhatla N; Gandhi AK; Sharma P; Gupta S; Julka PK
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(6):1537-41. PubMed ID: 22126495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Early stage cervical cancer: Brachytherapy followed by type a hysterectomy versus type B radical hysterectomy alone, a retrospective evaluation.
    Lacorre A; Merlot B; Garabedian C; Narducci F; Chereau E; Resbeut M; Minsat M; Leblanc E; Houvenaeghel G; Lambaudie E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 26725307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer patients without adjuvant treatment: Ancillary analysis of a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028).
    Paik ES; Lim MC; Kim MH; Kim YH; Song ES; Seong SJ; Suh DH; Lee JM; Lee C; Choi CH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):547-553. PubMed ID: 31272738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy and radiochemotherapy IIA2 (FIGO2018) cervical cancer: a retrospective study from a large database of 63,926 cases of cervical cancer in China.
    He J; Li D; Shen P; Liang W; Kang S; Zhang Y; Zhao H; Liu M; Wang X; Lin Z; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2022 Mar; 27(3):619-625. PubMed ID: 34837596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The long-term efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy compared with radical surgery alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy on locally advanced-stage cervical cancer.
    Yin M; Zhao F; Lou G; Zhang H; Sun M; Li C; Hou Y; Li X; Meng F; Chen X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Jan; 21(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 21330834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Survival Outcomes in Patients With 2018 FIGO Stage IA2-IIA2 Cervical Cancer Treated With Laparoscopic
    Zhao W; Xiao Y; Zhao W; Yang Q; Bi F
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():682849. PubMed ID: 34222001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Impact on survival and quality of life of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to patients with early-stage cervical cancer].
    Yang ZJ; Chen YL; Yao DS; Zhang JQ; Li F; Li L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 46(11):854-9. PubMed ID: 22333237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review.
    Wenzel HHB; Smolders RGV; Beltman JJ; Lambrechts S; Trum HW; Yigit R; Zusterzeel PLM; Zweemer RP; Mom CH; Bekkers RLM; Lemmens VEPP; Nijman HW; Van der Aa MA
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Jul; 133():14-21. PubMed ID: 32422504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimally invasive versus open surgery for women with stage 1A1 and stage 1A2 cervical cancer: A retrospective database cohort study.
    Hayek J; Mowzoon M; Demissie S; Palileo A; Serur E; Goldberg GL; Alagkiozidis I
    Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2022 May; 77():103507. PubMed ID: 35638032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Surgical outcomes of patients with stage IA2 cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy.
    Mahawerawat S; Charoenkwan K; Srisomboon J; Khunamornpong S; Suprasert P; Sae-Teng CT
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5375-8. PubMed ID: 24175829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can laparoscopic radical hysterectomy be a standard surgical modality in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer?
    Hong JH; Choi JS; Lee JH; Eom JM; Ko JH; Bae JW; Park SH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 22683586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hazard Ratio Analysis of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for IA1 With LVSI-IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Identifying the Possible Contraindications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Cervical Cancer.
    Li P; Liu P; Yang Y; Wang L; Liu J; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1002. PubMed ID: 32733796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prognostic value of ABO blood group in patients with early stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy with pelvic node dissection.
    Hanprasertpong J; Jiamset I; Atjimakul T
    Tumour Biol; 2016 Jun; 37(6):7421-30. PubMed ID: 26678885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and abdominal surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Chen C; Guo J; Liu P; Li Z; Jiang H; Zhu Q; Bin X; Lang J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Apr; 47(4):1516-1526. PubMed ID: 33527615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
    Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.