These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34676112)

  • 21. Integrative analysis of the Lake Simcoe watershed (Ontario, Canada) as a socio-ecological system.
    Neumann A; Kim DK; Perhar G; Arhonditsis GB
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Mar; 188():308-321. PubMed ID: 28002784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Goals, beneficiaries, and indicators of waterfront revitalization in Great Lakes Areas of Concern and coastal communities.
    Angradi TR; Williams KC; Hoffman JC; Bolgrien DW
    J Great Lakes Res; 2019 Nov; 45(5):851-863. PubMed ID: 33235405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of Lower Green Bay and Fox River, Collingwood Harbour, Spanish Harbour, and the.Metro Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan.(RAP) Processes.
    Gurtner-Zimmermann A
    Environ Manage; 1996 Jul; 20(4):449-59. PubMed ID: 8661614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Monitoring microbes in the Great Lakes.
    Bain MB; Cangelosi A; Eder TA
    Environ Monit Assess; 2011 Nov; 182(1-4):431-42. PubMed ID: 21336487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Progress toward delisting a Great Lakes Area of Concern: the role of integrated research and monitoring in the Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan.
    Hall JD; O'Connor K; Ranieri J
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Feb; 113(1-3):227-43. PubMed ID: 16447030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sentinel human health indicators: to evaluate the health status of vulnerable communities.
    Hicks HE; De Rosa CT
    Can J Public Health; 2002; 93 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S57-61. PubMed ID: 12425177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mapping health in the Great Lakes areas of concern: a user-friendly tool for policy and decision makers.
    Elliott SJ; Eyles J; DeLuca P
    Environ Health Perspect; 2001 Dec; 109 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):817-26. PubMed ID: 11744500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Applying best-worst scaling to rank ecosystem and economic benefits of restoration and conservation in the Great Lakes.
    Tyner EH; Boyer TA
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Feb; 255():109888. PubMed ID: 31790870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Valued ecosystem components for watershed cumulative effects: an analysis of environmental impact assessments in the South Saskatchewan River watershed, Canada.
    Ball MA; Noble BF; Dubé MG
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):469-79. PubMed ID: 22733426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attributes of successful actions to restore lakes and estuaries degraded by nutrient pollution.
    Gross C; Hagy JD
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Feb; 187():122-136. PubMed ID: 27886584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital.
    Schultz L; Folke C; Österblom H; Olsson P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7369-74. PubMed ID: 26082542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The dynamics of institutional innovation: Crafting co-management in small-scale fisheries through action research.
    Léopold M; Thébaud O; Charles A
    J Environ Manage; 2019 May; 237():187-199. PubMed ID: 30798038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A problem of social fit? Assessing the role of bridging organizations in the recoupling of socio-ecological systems.
    Boakye-Danquah J; Reed MG; Robson JP; Sato T
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():338-347. PubMed ID: 29936347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interactions between spatially explicit conservation and management measures: implications for the governance of marine protected areas.
    Cárcamo PF; Gaymer CF
    Environ Manage; 2013 Dec; 52(6):1355-68. PubMed ID: 24091586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How will China realize SDG 14 by 2030?- A case study of an institutional approach to achieve proper control of coastal water pollution.
    Mao Z; Xue X; Tian H; Michael AU
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Jan; 230():53-62. PubMed ID: 30265916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Establishing aquatic restoration priorities using a watershed approach.
    Bohn BA; Kershner JL
    J Environ Manage; 2002 Apr; 64(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 12141156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Changing Role of ENGOs in Water Governance: Institutional Entrepreneurs?
    Davidson SL; de Loë RC
    Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 57(1):62-78. PubMed ID: 26260985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microbial Source Tracking Using Quantitative and Digital PCR To Identify Sources of Fecal Contamination in Stormwater, River Water, and Beach Water in a Great Lakes Area of Concern.
    Staley ZR; Boyd RJ; Shum P; Edge TA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30097445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Aquatic ecological risk assessment frameworks in Canada: a case study using a single framework in South Baymouth, Ontario, Canada.
    Quanz M; Willis R; Burr D; Recoskie R; Walker TR
    Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Jul; 192(8):530. PubMed ID: 32681456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Enhancing ecosystem restoration efficiency through spatial and temporal coordination.
    Neeson TM; Ferris MC; Diebel MW; Doran PJ; O'Hanley JR; McIntyre PB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 May; 112(19):6236-41. PubMed ID: 25918378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.