BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34677751)

  • 1. Ability of non-invasive tear break-up time to determine tear instability in contact lens wearers.
    Muhafiz E; Demir MS
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Mar; 42(3):959-968. PubMed ID: 34677751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of hydrogel lens wear on tear film stability.
    Faber E; Golding TR; Lowe R; Brennan NA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 May; 68(5):380-4. PubMed ID: 1852401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel in vitro method to determine pre-lens tear break-up time of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Walther H; Subbaraman LN; Jones L
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Apr; 42(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 30442514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Precorneal and pre- and postlens tear film thickness measured indirectly with optical coherence tomography.
    Wang J; Fonn D; Simpson TL; Jones L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Jun; 44(6):2524-8. PubMed ID: 12766052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hydrogel lens dehydration and subjective comfort and dryness ratings in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers.
    Fonn D; Situ P; Simpson T
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Oct; 76(10):700-4. PubMed ID: 10524785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tear ferning in contact lens wearers.
    Evans KS; North RV; Purslow C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 19236590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre-contact lens and pre-corneal tear film kinetics.
    Guillon M; Dumbleton K; Theodoratos P; Patel K; Gupta R; Patel T
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Jun; 42(3):246-252. PubMed ID: 30819629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel method to predict the dry eye symptoms in new contact lens wearers.
    Pult H; Murphy PJ; Purslow C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 86(9):E1042-50. PubMed ID: 19668016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison and Evaluation of Prelens Tear Film Stability by Different Noninvasive in vivo Methods.
    Itokawa T; Suzuki T; Iwashita H; Hori Y
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():4459-4468. PubMed ID: 33376300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Multimodal evaluation of the ocular surface using a the new Lacrydiag device].
    Remongin PE; Rousseau A; Best AL; Ben Hadj Salah W; Legrand M; Benichou J; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2021 Mar; 44(3):313-320. PubMed ID: 33583607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and agreement of subjective and objective non-invasive break-up time measurements in contact lens wearers.
    Valencia-Nieto L; López-de la Rosa A; González-García MJ; López-Miguel A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jan; 44(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 37974449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of wearing a daily disposable lens on tear film: a randomised controlled trial.
    Chong PQ; Yeo S; Too CL; Boo C; Tong L
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 May; 99(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 27087449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of tear film and the morphological changes of meibomian glands in young Asian soft contact lens wearers and non-wearers.
    Gu T; Zhao L; Liu Z; Zhao S; Nian H; Wei R
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 32131774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of comfort and tear stability with two novel silicone-hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses.
    Mimura T; Noma H; Yamaguchi M; Shinbo K
    Int Ophthalmol; 2024 Mar; 44(1):136. PubMed ID: 38485796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing automated and manual assessments of tear break-up time using different non-invasive devices and a fluorescein procedure.
    Zeri F; Rizzo GC; Ponzini E; Tavazzi S
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):2516. PubMed ID: 38291100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soft lens lubricants and prelens tear film stability.
    Golding TR; Efron N; Brennan NA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jun; 67(6):461-5. PubMed ID: 2381689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of environmental conditions on tear dynamics in soft contact lens wearers.
    Maruyama K; Yokoi N; Takamata A; Kinoshita S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Aug; 45(8):2563-8. PubMed ID: 15277478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of tear volume (by tear meniscus height and phenol red thread test) and tear fluid osmolality measures in non-lens wearers and in contact lens wearers.
    Miller WL; Doughty MJ; Narayanan S; Leach NE; Tran A; Gaume AL; Bergmanson JP
    Eye Contact Lens; 2004 Jul; 30(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 15499232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of contact lens materials on tear physiology.
    Thai LC; Tomlinson A; Doane MG
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Mar; 81(3):194-204. PubMed ID: 15017179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association Between Ocular Surface Temperature and Tear Film Stability in Soft Contact Lens Wearers.
    Itokawa T; Okajima Y; Suzuki T; Kakisu K; Iwashita H; Murakami Y; Hori Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 59(2):771-775. PubMed ID: 29392323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.