These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34678328)

  • 1. Rethinking agrochemical safety assessment: A perspective.
    Sewell F; Lewis D; Mehta J; Terry C; Kimber I
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Dec; 127():105068. PubMed ID: 34678328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GHS additivity formula: A true replacement method for acute systemic toxicity testing of agrochemical formulations.
    Corvaro M; Gehen S; Andrews K; Chatfield R; Arasti C; Mehta J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Dec; 82():99-110. PubMed ID: 27765716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utilizing relative potency factors (RPF) and threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) concepts to assess hazard and human risk assessment profiles of environmental metabolites: a case study.
    Terry C; Rasoulpour RJ; Knowles S; Billington R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 25584438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comprehensive view on mechanistic approaches for cancer risk assessment of non-genotoxic agrochemicals.
    Luijten M; Corvi R; Mehta J; Corvaro M; Delrue N; Felter S; Haas B; Hewitt NJ; Hilton G; Holmes T; Jacobs MN; Jacobs A; Lamplmair F; Lewis D; Madia F; Manou I; Melching-Kollmuss S; Schorsch F; Schütte K; Sewell F; Strupp C; van der Laan JW; Wolf DC; Wolterink G; Woutersen R; Zvonar Z; Heusinkveld H; Braakhuis H
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Dec; 118():104789. PubMed ID: 33035627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rethinking chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity assessment for agrochemicals project (ReCAAP): A reporting framework to support a weight of evidence safety assessment without long-term rodent bioassays.
    Hilton GM; Adcock C; Akerman G; Baldassari J; Battalora M; Casey W; Clippinger AJ; Cope R; Goetz A; Hayes AW; Papineni S; Peffer RC; Ramsingh D; Williamson Riffle B; Sanches da Rocha M; Ryan N; Scollon E; Visconti N; Wolf DC; Yan Z; Lowit A
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Jun; 131():105160. PubMed ID: 35311659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards achieving a modern science-based paradigm for agrochemical carcinogenicity assessment.
    Hilton GM; Corvi R; Luijten M; Mehta J; Wolf DC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Jan; 137():105301. PubMed ID: 36436696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of a novel integrated toxicity testing strategy incorporating "3R" principles of animal research to evaluate the safety of a new agrochemical sulfoxaflor.
    Terry C; Rasoulpour RJ; Saghir S; Marty S; Gollapudi BB; Billington R
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2014 May; 44 Suppl 2():1-14. PubMed ID: 24832550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aligning the 3Rs with new paradigms in the safety assessment of chemicals.
    Burden N; Mahony C; Müller BP; Terry C; Westmoreland C; Kimber I
    Toxicology; 2015 Apr; 330():62-6. PubMed ID: 25932488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regulatory Acceptance of Alternative Methods in the Development and Approval of Pharmaceuticals.
    Beken S; Kasper P; van der Laan JW
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 856():33-64. PubMed ID: 27671719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The way forward in reproductive/developmental toxicity testing.
    Spielmann H
    Altern Lab Anim; 2009 Dec; 37(6):641-56. PubMed ID: 20105000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of carcinogenicity predictors from short-term and sub chronic repeat-dose studies of agrochemicals in rats: Opportunities to refine and reduce animal use.
    Mistry P; McInnes EF; Beevers C; Wolf D; Currie RA; Salimraj R; Parsons P
    Toxicol Lett; 2021 Oct; 351():18-27. PubMed ID: 34364947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-relevance of acute dermal toxicity testing for assessing human health protection in the regulatory decision-making for agrochemical formulated products.
    Latorre AO; Floresta PVM; Boff MM; Fagundes PM; Martins AP; Ihlaseh-Catalano SM; Cazarin KCC; Romeo LL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Aug; 106():105-110. PubMed ID: 31028798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of diurnal systemic dose of agrochemicals in regulatory toxicity testing--an integrated approach without additional animal use.
    Saghir SA; Bartels MJ; Rick DL; McCoy AT; Rasoulpour RJ; Ellis-Hutchings RG; Sue Marty M; Terry C; Bailey JP; Billington R; Bus JS
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jul; 63(2):321-32. PubMed ID: 22440553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current EU regulatory requirements for the assessment of chemicals and cosmetic products: challenges and opportunities for introducing new approach methodologies.
    Pistollato F; Madia F; Corvi R; Munn S; Grignard E; Paini A; Worth A; Bal-Price A; Prieto P; Casati S; Berggren E; Bopp SK; Zuang V
    Arch Toxicol; 2021 Jun; 95(6):1867-1897. PubMed ID: 33851225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Innovative strategy based on mechanisms to substitute animal testing for ocular toxicity assessment of agrochemical formulations market in Brazil.
    Andrade WM; da Silva ACG; Moreira LC; Gomes TRLES; Batista AC; Valadares MC
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Aug; 66():104851. PubMed ID: 32259559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The current status of exposure-driven approaches for chemical safety assessment: A cross-sector perspective.
    Sewell F; Aggarwal M; Bachler G; Broadmeadow A; Gellatly N; Moore E; Robinson S; Rooseboom M; Stevens A; Terry C; Burden N
    Toxicology; 2017 Aug; 389():109-117. PubMed ID: 28774667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ECVAM and new technologies for toxicity testing.
    Bouvier d'Yvoire M; Bremer S; Casati S; Ceridono M; Coecke S; Corvi R; Eskes C; Gribaldo L; Griesinger C; Knaut H; Linge JP; Roi A; Zuang V
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2012; 745():154-80. PubMed ID: 22437818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The era of 3Rs implementation in developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) testing: Current overview and future perspectives.
    Beekhuijzen M
    Reprod Toxicol; 2017 Sep; 72():86-96. PubMed ID: 28552675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A tiered approach to systemic toxicity testing for agricultural chemical safety assessment.
    Doe JE; Boobis AR; Blacker A; Dellarco V; Doerrer NG; Franklin C; Goodman JI; Kronenberg JM; Lewis R; Mcconnell EE; Mercier T; Moretto A; Nolan C; Padilla S; Phang W; Solecki R; Tilbury L; van Ravenzwaay B; Wolf DC
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2006 Jan; 36(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 16708694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment.
    Burden N; Sewell F; Andersen ME; Boobis A; Chipman JK; Cronin MT; Hutchinson TH; Kimber I; Whelan M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Sep; 35(9):971-5. PubMed ID: 25943792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.