These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34678549)

  • 1. Effects of an integrated collision warning system on risk compensation behavior: An examination under naturalistic driving conditions.
    Yu B; Bao S; Chen Y; LeBlanc DJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106450. PubMed ID: 34678549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An examination of teen drivers' car-following behavior under naturalistic driving conditions: With and without an advanced driving assistance system.
    Bao S; Wu L; Yu B; Sayer JR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Nov; 147():105762. PubMed ID: 32942123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the impact of advanced driver assistance systems on driving distraction and risky behaviour: An empirical analysis of irish commercial drivers.
    Masello L; Sheehan B; Castignani G; Shannon D; Murphy F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Apr; 183():106969. PubMed ID: 36696744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying visual road environment to establish a speeding prediction model: An examination using naturalistic driving data.
    Yu B; Chen Y; Bao S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():289-298. PubMed ID: 31177040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-depth analysis of crash contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions among at-risk drivers using the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study.
    Seacrist T; Maheshwari J; Sarfare S; Chingas G; Thirkill M; Loeb HS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S68-S73. PubMed ID: 34663136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting crash-relevant violations at stop sign-controlled intersections for the development of an intersection driver assistance system.
    Scanlon JM; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():59-65. PubMed ID: 27586104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modelling braking behaviour of distracted young drivers in car-following interactions: A grouped random parameters duration model with heterogeneity-in-means.
    Ali Y; Haque MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 185():107015. PubMed ID: 36889237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of Forward Collision Warning Algorithm Considering Truck Driver Response Behavior Characteristics.
    Bao Y; Wang X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Apr; 198():107450. PubMed ID: 38340471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population distributions of time to collision at brake application during car following from naturalistic driving data.
    Kusano KD; Chen R; Montgomery J; Gabler HC
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():95-104. PubMed ID: 26403908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing an improved automatic preventive braking system based on safety-critical car-following events from naturalistic driving study data.
    Zhou W; Wang X; Glaser Y; Wu X; Xu X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Dec; 178():106834. PubMed ID: 36150234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of driver's braking behavior by the real-time pedestrian scale warning system.
    Park H; Oh T; Kim I
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Sep; 205():107685. PubMed ID: 38897140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of lead time of verbal collision warning messages on driving behavior in connected vehicle settings.
    Wan J; Wu C; Zhang Y
    J Safety Res; 2016 Sep; 58():89-98. PubMed ID: 27620938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel collision warning system based on the visual road environment schema: An examination from vehicle and driver characteristics.
    Li Z; Yu B; Wang Y; Chen Y; Kong Y; Xu Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107154. PubMed ID: 37343457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Steering or braking avoidance response in SHRP2 rear-end crashes and near-crashes: A decision tree approach.
    Sarkar A; Hickman JS; McDonald AD; Huang W; Vogelpohl T; Markkula G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 May; 154():106055. PubMed ID: 33691227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data.
    Xiong H; Bao S; Sayer J; Kato K
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():89-93. PubMed ID: 26403907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.