These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34678552)

  • 21. The use of machine learning for the determination of a type/model of firearms by the characteristics on cartridge cases.
    Giverts P; Sorokina K; Barash M; Fedorenko V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 May; 358():112021. PubMed ID: 38615428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determining the number of test fires needed to represent the variability present within firearms of various calibers.
    Law EF; Morris KB; Jelsema CM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Sep; 290():56-61. PubMed ID: 30015280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How to recognise the traces left on a crime scene by a 3D-printed Liberator? Part 2. Elements of ammunition, marks on the weapons and polymer fragments.
    Honsberger H; Werner D; Rhumorbarbe D; Riva F; Glardon M; Gallusser A; Delémont O
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Feb; 295():137-144. PubMed ID: 30599333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pervasiveness of inorganic gunshot residue (IGSR) in handguns after cleaning and conditioning procedures.
    Donghi M; Orsenigo S; Manna L; Profumo A; Mattino A; Merli D
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 May; 69(3):1035-1044. PubMed ID: 38332695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of luminescent gunshot residues markers in forensic context.
    Weber IT; Melo AJ; Lucena MA; Consoli EF; Rodrigues MO; de Sá GF; Maldaner AO; Talhavini M; Alves S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Nov; 244():276-84. PubMed ID: 25305530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Which Are the Most Determinant Psychological Factors in Olympic Shooting Performance? A Self-Perspective from Elite Shooters.
    Moreira da Silva F; Malico Sousa P; Pinheiro VB; López-Torres O; Refoyo Roman I; Mon-López D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 33925508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance Evaluation of a Registered Ballistic Database Using the Evofinder® System.
    Li Y; Lin S; Luo Y; Mi Z
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1335-1344. PubMed ID: 30901079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A study of transfer and prevalence of organic gunshot residues.
    Hofstetter C; Maitre M; Beavis A; Roux CP; Weyermann C; Gassner AL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():241-251. PubMed ID: 28688314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Application of lead isotope analysis in shooting incident investigations.
    Zeichner A; Ehrlich S; Shoshani E; Halicz L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Apr; 158(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 15967612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development of STR profiles from firearms and fired cartridge cases.
    Horsman-Hall KM; Orihuela Y; Karczynski SL; Davis AL; Ban JD; Greenspoon SA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 19647709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A study of examiner accuracy in cartridge case comparisons. Part 1: Examiner error rates.
    Baldwin DP; Bajic SJ; Morris MD; Zamzow DS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Aug; 349():111733. PubMed ID: 37257388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Research Progress on Touch DNA on Cartridge Cases in Forensic Field].
    Xin Y
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 37(4):555-560. PubMed ID: 34726011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners.
    Monson KL; Smith ED; Peters EM
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jan; 68(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 36183147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An evaluation of the discriminating power of an Integrated Ballistics Identification System
    Morris KB; Law EF; Jefferys RL; Dearth EC; Fabyanic EB
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Nov; 280():188-193. PubMed ID: 29078161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Approach to breech face impression comparison based on the robust estimation of a correspondence function.
    Zhang H; Zaman Robin AU; Zhu J; Lu C; Fang C; Shyha I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111229. PubMed ID: 35219095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Timing of triggering in relation to the cardiac cycle in nonelite rifle shooters.
    Konttinen N; Mets T; Lyytinen H; Paananen M
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2003 Dec; 74(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 14768841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory risk estimates for youth target shooting.
    Meinke DK; Murphy WJ; Finan DS; Lankford JE; Flamme GA; Stewart M; Soendergaard J; Jerome TW
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53 Suppl 2(0 2):S16-25. PubMed ID: 24564688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lead exposure at firing ranges-a review.
    Laidlaw MA; Filippelli G; Mielke H; Gulson B; Ball AS
    Environ Health; 2017 Apr; 16(1):34. PubMed ID: 28376827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the prevalence of gunshot residue in selected populations - an empirical study performed with SEM-EDX analysis.
    Brożek-Mucha Z
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Apr; 237():46-52. PubMed ID: 24595061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nothing but hot air?-On the molecular ballistic analysis of backspatter generated by and the hazard potential of blank guns.
    Euteneuer J; Gosch A; Courts C
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 Sep; 135(5):2061-2071. PubMed ID: 33686487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.