BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34679446)

  • 1. Preoperative CT or PET/CT to Assess Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymph Node Status in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Mimoun C; Rouzier R; Benifla JL; Fauconnier A; Huchon C
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34679446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoperative Clinical Examination for Assessing Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymph Node Involvement in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Mimoun C; Benifla JL; Fauconnier A; Huchon C
    J Clin Med; 2020 Aug; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 32872558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative
    Hu J; Zhang K; Yan Y; Zang Y; Wang Y; Xue F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):519-529. PubMed ID: 31165242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FDG PET/CT in staging of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: frequency of supradiaphragmatic lymph node metastasis challenges the traditional pattern of disease spread.
    Hynninen J; Auranen A; Carpén O; Dean K; Seppänen M; Kemppainen J; Lavonius M; Lisinen I; Virtanen J; Grénman S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jul; 126(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 22542580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of Lymph Node Involvement with PET-CT in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A FRANCOGYN Group Study.
    Tardieu A; Ouldamer L; Margueritte F; Rossard L; Lacorre A; Bourdel N; Lades G; Sallée C; Monteil J; Gauthier T
    J Clin Med; 2021 Feb; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 33562725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Biomarkers for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Reijnen C; IntHout J; Massuger LFAG; Strobbe F; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Haldorsen IS; Snijders MPLM; Pijnenborg JMA
    Oncologist; 2019 Sep; 24(9):e880-e890. PubMed ID: 31186375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Role of
    Tu X; Zhang C; Liu Z; Shen G; Wu X; Nie L; Chang T; Xu H; Bao Y; Yang L; Wei Q
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1365. PubMed ID: 33014777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Endometrial Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.
    Bollineni VR; Ytre-Hauge S; Bollineni-Balabay O; Salvesen HB; Haldorsen IS
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Jun; 57(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 26823564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic role of F-18 FDG PET/CT for preoperative lymph node staging in thyroid cancer patients; A systematic review and metaanalysis.
    Kim DH; Kim SJ
    Clin Imaging; 2020 Sep; 65():100-107. PubMed ID: 32387798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of Different Imaging Techniques for Detection of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis from Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Gong Y; Guo Z; Tang X; Li C; Wang Q
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(1):53-71. PubMed ID: 31505492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT tumor markers outperform MRI-based markers for the prediction of lymph node metastases in primary endometrial cancer.
    Fasmer KE; Gulati A; Dybvik JA; Ytre-Hauge S; Salvesen Ø; Trovik J; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IS
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2443-2453. PubMed ID: 32034487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of lymph node metastasis in clinically node negative head and neck cancer patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kim SJ; Pak K; Kim K
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2019; 40(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 30473166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
    Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
    BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different imaging techniques for the detection of pelvic lymph nodes metastasis from gynecological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gong Y; Wang Q; Dong L; Jia Y; Hua C; Mi F; Li C
    Oncotarget; 2017 Feb; 8(8):14107-14125. PubMed ID: 27802186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pattern and clinical predictors of lymph node metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Harter P; Gnauert K; Hils R; Lehmann TG; Fisseler-Eckhoff A; Traut A; du Bois A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(6):1238-44. PubMed ID: 17433064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in staging bladder cancer: a single-institution study and a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Soubra A; Hayward D; Dahm P; Goldfarb R; Froehlich J; Jha G; Konety BR
    World J Urol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1229-37. PubMed ID: 26847182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct comparison of choline PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer.
    Huang SM; Yin L; Yue JL; Li YF; Yang Y; Lin ZC
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Dec; 97(50):e13344. PubMed ID: 30557983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic Accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for Preoperative Lymph Node Staging in Newly Diagnosed Bladder Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Ha HK; Koo PJ; Kim SJ
    Oncology; 2018; 95(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29847834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PET/CT and MRI for Identifying Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhang X; Liu Y; Luo H; Zhang J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Dec; 52(6):1840-1851. PubMed ID: 32567090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.