167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34679446)
61.
Petersen LJ; Nielsen JB; Langkilde NC; Petersen A; Afshar-Oromieh A; De Souza NM; De Paepe K; Fisker RV; Arp DT; Carl J; Haberkorn U; Zacho HD
World J Urol; 2020 Apr; 38(4):939-948. PubMed ID: 31190153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Integrated analysis of
Girard A; Rouanne M; Taconet S; Radulescu C; Neuzillet Y; Girma A; Beaufrere A; Lebret T; Le Stanc E; Grellier JF
Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):4286-4293. PubMed ID: 30666449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hoshino N; Murakami K; Hida K; Sakamoto T; Sakai Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Jan; 24(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 30259217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Preoperative staging of pelvic lymph nodes in prostate cancer by 11C-choline PET.
de Jong IJ; Pruim J; Elsinga PH; Vaalburg W; Mensink HJ
J Nucl Med; 2003 Mar; 44(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 12620996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
Ishihara S; Kawai K; Tanaka T; Kiyomatsu T; Hata K; Nozawa H; Morikawa T; Watanabe T
Tech Coloproctol; 2018 May; 22(5):347-354. PubMed ID: 29623475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Value of 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET for the Assessment of Lymph Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence: Comparison with Histopathology After Salvage Lymphadenectomy.
Rauscher I; Maurer T; Beer AJ; Graner FP; Haller B; Weirich G; Doherty A; Gschwend JE; Schwaiger M; Eiber M
J Nucl Med; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1713-1719. PubMed ID: 27261524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Metabolic Tumor Volume on 18F-FDG PET/CT Improves Preoperative Identification of High-Risk Endometrial Carcinoma Patients.
Husby JA; Reitan BC; Biermann M; Trovik J; Bjørge L; Magnussen IJ; Salvesen ØO; Salvesen HB; Haldorsen IS
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1191-8. PubMed ID: 26045311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET for evaluation of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
Cheng X; Li Y; Liu B; Xu Z; Bao L; Wang J
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jul; 53(6):615-27. PubMed ID: 22734080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Positron emission tomography alone, positron emission tomography-computed tomography and computed tomography in diagnosing recurrent cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xiao Y; Wei J; Zhang Y; Xiong W
Arch Med Sci; 2014 May; 10(2):222-31. PubMed ID: 24904653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Potential performance of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT compared with single-time-point imaging for differential diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes: a meta-analysis.
Shen G; Deng H; Hu S; Jia Z
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Oct; 35(10):1003-10. PubMed ID: 25023998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Detection of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer patients with clinically N0 neck-a meta-analysis comparing different imaging modalities.
Liao LJ; Lo WC; Hsu WL; Wang CT; Lai MS
BMC Cancer; 2012 Jun; 12():236. PubMed ID: 22691269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings.
Ramirez PT; Jhingran A; Macapinlac HA; Euscher ED; Munsell MF; Coleman RL; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; Frumovitz M; Ramondetta LM
Cancer; 2011 May; 117(9):1928-34. PubMed ID: 21509770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Comparative accuracy of qualitative and quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT analysis in detection of lymph node metastasis from anal cancer.
Chulroek T; Kordbacheh H; Wangcharoenrung D; Cattapan K; Heidari P; Harisinghani MG
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):828-835. PubMed ID: 30694369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 29 Studies Predicting Diagnostic Accuracy of CT, MRI, PET, and USG in Detecting Extracapsular Spread in Head and Neck Cancers.
Mair M; Singhavi H; Pai A; Khan M; Conboy P; Olaleye O; Salha R; Ameerally P; Vaidhyanath R; Chaturvedi P
Cancers (Basel); 2024 Apr; 16(8):. PubMed ID: 38672539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Meta-analysis of PET/CT Detect Lymph Nodes Metastases of Cervical Cancer.
Ruan J; Zhang Y; Ren H
Open Med (Wars); 2018; 13():436-442. PubMed ID: 30263970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Role of ultrasound in detection of lymph-node metastasis in gynecological cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Borges AC; Veloso H; Galindo P; Danés A; Chacon E; Mínguez JA; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38452144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Machine learning for lymph node metastasis prediction of in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li Y; Xie F; Xiong Q; Lei H; Feng P
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():946038. PubMed ID: 36059703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Diagnosis accuracy of the miR-200 family tumor marker series in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu L; Li P; Wang Q; Dong C; Guo M; Wang R
Transl Cancer Res; 2022 Jul; 11(7):2283-2290. PubMed ID: 35966325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Predictive significance of preoperative CT findings for suboptimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.
Hu TWY; Nie D; Gou JH; Li ZY
Cancer Manag Res; 2018; 10():2019-2030. PubMed ID: 30038518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
