142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34679525)
21. Cyclotron Production and Separation of Scandium Radionuclides from Natural Titanium Metal and Titanium Dioxide Targets.
Loveless CS; Blanco JR; Diehl GL; Elbahrawi RT; Carzaniga TS; Braccini S; Lapi SE
J Nucl Med; 2021 Jan; 62(1):131-136. PubMed ID: 32620699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Image Quality and Semiquantitative Measurements on the Biograph Vision PET/CT System: Initial Experiences and Comparison with the Biograph mCT.
van Sluis J; Boellaard R; Somasundaram A; van Snick PH; Borra RJH; Dierckx RAJO; Stormezand GN; Glaudemans AWJM; Noordzij W
J Nucl Med; 2020 Jan; 61(1):129-135. PubMed ID: 31253742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparative PET imaging study of
Ferguson S; Wuest M; Richter S; Bergman C; Dufour J; Krys D; Simone J; Jans HS; Riauka T; Wuest F
Nucl Med Biol; 2020; 90-91():74-83. PubMed ID: 33189947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An Unusual Pair: Facile Formation and In Vivo Validation of Robust Sc-
Whetter JN; Vaughn BA; Koller AJ; Boros E
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2022 Feb; 61(7):e202114203. PubMed ID: 34889014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Image quality analysis of
Rosar F; Buchholz HG; Michels S; Hoffmann MA; Piel M; Waldmann CM; Rösch F; Reuss S; Schreckenberger M
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Mar; 7(1):16. PubMed ID: 32166581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative positron emission tomography imaging in the presence of iodinated contrast media using electron density quantifications from dual-energy computed tomography.
Shapira N; Scheuermann J; Perkins AE; Kim J; Liu LP; Karp JS; Noël PB
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):273-286. PubMed ID: 33170953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spatial resolution and image qualities of Zr-89 on Siemens Biograph TruePoint PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim JY; Kim BI; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2015 Feb; 30(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 25549151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantification accuracy of neuro-oncology PET data as a function of emission scan duration in PET/MR compared to PET/CT.
Wampl S; Rausch I; Traub-Weidinger T; Beyer T; Gröschl M; Cal-González J
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():257-264. PubMed ID: 28987677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of dedicated breast positron emission tomography and whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography images: a common phantom study.
Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Imai M; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 31768819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accelerator Production of Scandium Radioisotopes: Sc-43, Sc-44, and Sc-47.
Chernysheva M; Loveless SC; Brossard T; Becker K; Cingoranelli S; Aluicio-Sarduy E; Song J; Ellison P; Nolen J; Rotsch DA; Lapi SE; Engle JW
Curr Radiopharm; 2021; 14(4):359-373. PubMed ID: 33438551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Production and Use of the First-Row Transition Metal PET Radionuclides
Chaple IF; Lapi SE
J Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1655-1659. PubMed ID: 30262514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantitative accuracy of PET/CT for image-based kinetic analysis.
Seo Y; Teo BK; Hadi M; Schreck C; Bacharach SL; Hasegawa BH
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3086-9. PubMed ID: 18697532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. PET NEMA IQ Phantom dataset: image reconstruction settings for quantitative PET imaging.
Vosoughi H; Hajizadeh M; Emami F; Momennezhad M; Geramifar P
Data Brief; 2021 Aug; 37():107231. PubMed ID: 34195308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluating and comparing the image quality and quantification accuracy of SiPM-PET/CT and PMT-PET/CT.
Tsutsui Y; Awamoto S; Himuro K; Kato T; Baba S; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):725-735. PubMed ID: 32621167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Image Quality and Activity Optimization in Oncologic
van Sluis J; Boellaard R; Dierckx RAJO; Stormezand GN; Glaudemans AWJM; Noordzij W
J Nucl Med; 2020 May; 61(5):764-771. PubMed ID: 31628214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Iodine-124 PET dosimetry in differentiated thyroid cancer: recovery coefficient in 2D and 3D modes for PET(/CT) systems.
Jentzen W; Weise R; Kupferschläger J; Freudenberg L; Brandau W; Bares R; Burchert W; Bockisch A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Mar; 35(3):611-23. PubMed ID: 17929014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems.
Rubello D; Colletti PM
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Current State of
Schmidt CE; Gajecki L; Deri MA; Sanders VA
Curr Radiopharm; 2023; 16(2):95-106. PubMed ID: 36372922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The quantification of PET-CT radiotracers to determine minimal scan time using quadratic formulation.
Said MA; Musarudin M; Zulkaffli NF
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Dec; 34(12):884-891. PubMed ID: 33141408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
