These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34680954)

  • 21. An inter-laboratory comparison of probabilistic genotyping parameters and evaluation of performance on DNA mixtures from different laboratories.
    Boodoosingh S; Kelly H; Curran JM; Kalafut T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 71():103046. PubMed ID: 38598920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.
    Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigating a common approach to DNA profile interpretation using probabilistic software.
    Cooper S; McGovern C; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():121-131. PubMed ID: 25596557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo genotyping algorithm on PROVEDIt mixtures including a novel precision benchmark.
    Susik M; Sbalzarini IF
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 May; 64():102840. PubMed ID: 36764220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRMix™ and TrueAllele™.
    Thompson WC
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 May; 68(3):1049-1063. PubMed ID: 36847295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. EFMrep: An extension of EuroForMix for improved combination of STR DNA mixture profiles.
    Bleka Ø; Prieto L; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Nov; 61():102771. PubMed ID: 36075175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Inter-sample contamination detection using mixture deconvolution comparison.
    Taylor D; Rowe E; Kruijver M; Abarno D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():160-167. PubMed ID: 30851600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of mixed DNA profiles from the RapidHIT™ ID platform using probabilistic genotyping software STRmix™.
    Ward D; Henry J; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 May; 58():102664. PubMed ID: 35091215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Software for Single Cell STR Analysis.
    Huffman K; Ballantyne J
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A series of recommended tests when validating probabilistic DNA profile interpretation software.
    Bright JA; Evett IW; Taylor D; Curran JM; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jan; 14():125-31. PubMed ID: 25450783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An Investigation into Compound Likelihood Ratios for Forensic DNA Mixtures.
    Wivell R; Kelly H; Kokoszka J; Daniels J; Dickson L; Buckleton J; Bright JA
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Massively parallel sequencing analysis of nondegraded and degraded DNA mixtures using the ForenSeq™ system in combination with EuroForMix software.
    Hwa HL; Wu MY; Chung WC; Ko TM; Lin CP; Yin HI; Lee TT; Lee JC
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Jan; 133(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 30374565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Addressing uncertain assumptions in DNA evidence evaluation.
    Kruijver M; Kelly H; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Sep; 66():102913. PubMed ID: 37453205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The interpretation of mixed DNA profiles from a mother, father, and child trio.
    Lin MH; Bright JA; Pugh SN; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102175. PubMed ID: 31644964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An examination of STR nomenclatures, filters and models for MPS mixture interpretation.
    Bleka Ø; Just R; Le J; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102319. PubMed ID: 32563046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficient exact maximum a posteriori computation for bayesian SNP genotyping in polyploids.
    Serang O; Mollinari M; Garcia AA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e30906. PubMed ID: 22363513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improving the Utilization of STRmix™ Variance Parameters as Semi-Quantitative Profile Modeling Metrics.
    Duke K; Myers S; Cuenca D; Wallin J
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 36672842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Open source software EuroForMix can be used to analyse complex SNP mixtures.
    Bleka Ø; Eduardoff M; Santos C; Phillips C; Parson W; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():105-110. PubMed ID: 28942111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Noninvasive Fetal RhD Blood Group Genotyping: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2020; 20(15):1-160. PubMed ID: 33240456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. RFU derived LRs for activity level assignments using Bayesian Networks.
    Gill P; Bleka Ø; Fonneløp AE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jan; 56():102608. PubMed ID: 34735938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.