These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34681569)

  • 1. AMaLa: Analysis of Directed Evolution Experiments via Annealed Mutational Approximated Landscape.
    Sesta L; Uguzzoni G; Fernandez-de-Cossio-Diaz J; Pagnani A
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 34681569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unsupervised Inference of Protein Fitness Landscape from Deep Mutational Scan.
    Fernandez-de-Cossio-Diaz J; Uguzzoni G; Pagnani A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Jan; 38(1):318-328. PubMed ID: 32770229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictable properties of fitness landscapes induced by adaptational tradeoffs.
    Das SG; Direito SO; Waclaw B; Allen RJ; Krug J
    Elife; 2020 May; 9():. PubMed ID: 32423531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inferring protein fitness landscapes from laboratory evolution experiments.
    D'Costa S; Hinds EC; Freschlin CR; Song H; Romero PA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Mar; 19(3):e1010956. PubMed ID: 36857380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive models for population performance on real biological fitness landscapes.
    Rowe W; Wedge DC; Platt M; Kell DB; Knowles J
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Sep; 26(17):2145-52. PubMed ID: 20639542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Molecular Fitness Landscapes from High-Coverage Sequence Profiling.
    Blanco C; Janzen E; Pressman A; Saha R; Chen IA
    Annu Rev Biophys; 2019 May; 48():1-18. PubMed ID: 30601678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo functional phenotypes from a computational epistatic model of evolution.
    Alvarez S; Nartey CM; Mercado N; de la Paz JA; Huseinbegovic T; Morcos F
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Feb; 121(6):e2308895121. PubMed ID: 38285950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inference of annealed protein fitness landscapes with AnnealDCA.
    Sesta L; Pagnani A; Fernandez-de-Cossio-Diaz J; Uguzzoni G
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 Feb; 20(2):e1011812. PubMed ID: 38377054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting mutant outcome by combining deep mutational scanning and machine learning.
    Sarfati H; Naftaly S; Papo N; Keasar C
    Proteins; 2022 Jan; 90(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 34293212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the evolution of resistance to multiple antibiotics enables prediction of the Escherichia coli phenotype-based fitness landscape.
    Iwasawa J; Maeda T; Shibai A; Kotani H; Kawada M; Furusawa C
    PLoS Biol; 2022 Dec; 20(12):e3001920. PubMed ID: 36512529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Highly active enzymes produced by directed evolution with stability-based selection.
    Kurahashi R; Tanaka SI; Takano K
    Enzyme Microb Technol; 2020 Oct; 140():109626. PubMed ID: 32912686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational analysis of fitness landscapes and evolutionary networks from in vitro evolution experiments.
    Xulvi-Brunet R; Campbell GW; Rajamani S; Jiménez JI; Chen IA
    Methods; 2016 Aug; 106():86-96. PubMed ID: 27211010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolutionary accessibility of mutational pathways.
    Franke J; Klözer A; de Visser JA; Krug J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2011 Aug; 7(8):e1002134. PubMed ID: 21876664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How Good Are Statistical Models at Approximating Complex Fitness Landscapes?
    du Plessis L; Leventhal GE; Bonhoeffer S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Sep; 33(9):2454-68. PubMed ID: 27189564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rational evolutionary design: the theory of in vitro protein evolution.
    Voigt CA; Kauffman S; Wang ZG
    Adv Protein Chem; 2000; 55():79-160. PubMed ID: 11050933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution in the light of fitness landscape theory.
    Fragata I; Blanckaert A; Dias Louro MA; Liberles DA; Bank C
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2019 Jan; 34(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 30583805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deciphering protein evolution and fitness landscapes with latent space models.
    Ding X; Zou Z; Brooks Iii CL
    Nat Commun; 2019 Dec; 10(1):5644. PubMed ID: 31822668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental Evolution and Resequencing Analysis of Yeast.
    Payen C; Dunham MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1361():361-74. PubMed ID: 26483032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental selection and epistasis in an empirical phenotype-environment-fitness landscape.
    Chen JZ; Fowler DM; Tokuriki N
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2022 Apr; 6(4):427-438. PubMed ID: 35210579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fitness Landscape Analysis of a tRNA Gene Reveals that the Wild Type Allele is Sub-optimal, Yet Mutationally Robust.
    Gabzi T; Pilpel Y; Friedlander T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2022 Sep; 39(9):. PubMed ID: 35976926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.