These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34682041)
1. An Improved Slice Reconciliation Protocol for Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution. Wen X; Li Q; Mao H; Wen X; Chen N Entropy (Basel); 2021 Oct; 23(10):. PubMed ID: 34682041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Continuous-variable quantum key distribution with low-complexity information reconciliation. Wang X; Wang H; Zhou C; Chen Z; Yu S; Guo H Opt Express; 2022 Aug; 30(17):30455-30465. PubMed ID: 36242149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel error correction protocol for continuous variable quantum key distribution. Gümüş K; Eriksson TA; Takeoka M; Fujiwara M; Sasaki M; Schmalen L; Alvarado A Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10465. PubMed ID: 34001965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-matrix error estimation and reconciliation for quantum key distribution. Gao C; Jiang D; Guo Y; Chen L Opt Express; 2019 May; 27(10):14545-14566. PubMed ID: 31163901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blind information reconciliation with variable step sizes for quantum key distribution. Liu Z; Wu Z; Huang A Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):171. PubMed ID: 31932615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Realistic rate-distance limit of continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Wang X; Guo S; Wang P; Liu W; Li Y Opt Express; 2019 Apr; 27(9):13372-13386. PubMed ID: 31052862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance analysis for OFDM-based multi-carrier continuous-variable quantum key distribution with an arbitrary modulation protocol. Wang H; Pan Y; Shao Y; Pi Y; Ye T; Li Y; Zhang T; Liu J; Yang J; Ma L; Huang W; Xu B Opt Express; 2023 Feb; 31(4):5577-5592. PubMed ID: 36823834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Employing covert communications-based information reconciliation and multiple spatial modes to polarization entanglement QKD. Gariano J; Djordjevic IB Opt Lett; 2019 Feb; 44(3):687-690. PubMed ID: 30702711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overcoming the rate-distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters. Lucamarini M; Yuan ZL; Dynes JF; Shields AJ Nature; 2018 May; 557(7705):400-403. PubMed ID: 29720656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High Efficiency Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution Based on ATSC 3.0 LDPC Codes. Zhang K; Jiang XQ; Feng Y; Qiu R; Bai E Entropy (Basel); 2020 Sep; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 33286856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High throughput error correction in information reconciliation for semiconductor superlattice secure key distribution. Xie J; Wu H; Xia C; Ding P; Song H; Xu L; Chen X Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3909. PubMed ID: 33594169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Security Analysis of a Passive Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution by Considering Finite-Size Effect. Xu S; Li Y; Wang Y; Mao Y; Wu X; Guo Y Entropy (Basel); 2021 Dec; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 34946004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Asymmetric Adaptive LDPC-Based Information Reconciliation for Industrial Quantum Key Distribution. Borisov N; Petrov I; Tayduganov A Entropy (Basel); 2022 Dec; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 36673171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]