250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34682675)
21. Do sugar-sweetened beverage taxes improve public health for high school aged adolescents?
Flynn J
Health Econ; 2023 Jan; 32(1):47-64. PubMed ID: 36180999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Unemployment claims in Philadelphia one year after implementation of the sweetened beverage tax.
Lawman HG; Bleich SN; Yan J; LeVasseur MT; Mitra N; Roberto CA
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213218. PubMed ID: 30917140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Volume, Tiered, and Absolute Sugar Content Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policies in the United States: A Microsimulation Study.
Lee Y; Mozaffarian D; Sy S; Liu J; Wilde PE; Marklund M; Abrahams-Gessel S; Gaziano TA; Micha R
Circulation; 2020 Aug; 142(6):523-534. PubMed ID: 32564614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Taxes and front-of-package labels improve the healthiness of beverage and snack purchases: a randomized experimental marketplace.
Acton RB; Jones AC; Kirkpatrick SI; Roberto CA; Hammond D
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2019 May; 16(1):46. PubMed ID: 31113448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Perceived Beverage Healthfulness, Tax Awareness, and Tax Opinions.
Lowery CM; Roberto CA; Hua SV; Bleich SN; Mitra N; Lawman HG; Taillie LS; Ng SW; Gibson LA
J Nutr Educ Behav; 2024 May; 56(5):321-331. PubMed ID: 38466246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of an excise tax on the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in young people living in poorer neighbourhoods of Catalonia, Spain: a difference in differences study.
Royo-Bordonada MÁ; Fernández-Escobar C; Simón L; Sanz-Barbero B; Padilla J
BMC Public Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1553. PubMed ID: 31752787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.
Silver LD; Ng SW; Ryan-Ibarra S; Taillie LS; Induni M; Miles DR; Poti JM; Popkin BM
PLoS Med; 2017 Apr; 14(4):e1002283. PubMed ID: 28419108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Strengthening prevention of nutrition-related non-communicable diseases through sugar-sweetened beverages tax in Rwanda: a policy landscape analysis.
Ruhara CM; Abdool Karim S; Erzse A; Thow AM; Ntirampeba S; Hofman KJ
Glob Health Action; 2021 Jan; 14(1):1883911. PubMed ID: 33876706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Taxed and untaxed beverage intake by South African young adults after a national sugar-sweetened beverage tax: A before-and-after study.
Essman M; Taillie LS; Frank T; Ng SW; Popkin BM; Swart EC
PLoS Med; 2021 May; 18(5):e1003574. PubMed ID: 34032809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Chile's 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: An observational study in an urban environment.
Caro JC; Corvalán C; Reyes M; Silva A; Popkin B; Taillie LS
PLoS Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):e1002597. PubMed ID: 29969444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Oakland's sugar-sweetened beverage tax: Impacts on prices, purchases and consumption by adults and children.
Cawley J; Frisvold D; Hill A; Jones D
Econ Hum Biol; 2020 May; 37():100865. PubMed ID: 32126505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Short-Term Impacts of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Beverage Consumption.
Zhong Y; Auchincloss AH; Lee BK; Kanter GP
Am J Prev Med; 2018 Jul; 55(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 29656917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Case Study of the Philadelphia Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policymaking Process: Implications for Policy Development and Advocacy.
Purtle J; Langellier B; Lê-Scherban F
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2018; 24(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 28257409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: Enact taxes on sugar sweetened beverages to prevent chronic disease.
Taber DR; Dulin-Keita A; Fallon M; Chaloupka FJ; Andreyeva T; Schwartz MB; Harris JL
Transl Behav Med; 2019 Jan; 9(1):179-183. PubMed ID: 29648617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes: Industry Response and Tactics.
Du M; Tugendhaft A; Erzse A; Hofman KJ
Yale J Biol Med; 2018 Jun; 91(2):185-190. PubMed ID: 29955223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The impact of the Cook County, IL, Sweetened Beverage Tax on beverage prices.
Powell LM; Leider J; Léger PT
Econ Hum Biol; 2020 May; 37():100855. PubMed ID: 32028211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax: The Authors Reply.
Colchero MA; Ng SW; Popkin BM
Health Aff (Millwood); 2017 Jun; 36(6):1145. PubMed ID: 28583980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Understanding beverage taxation: Perspective on the Philadelphia Beverage Tax's novel approach.
Kane RM; Malik VS
J Public Health Res; 2019 Mar; 8(1):1466. PubMed ID: 31044136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Insights on the Influence of Sugar Taxes on Obesity Prevention Efforts.
Fernandez MA; Raine KD
Curr Nutr Rep; 2019 Dec; 8(4):333-339. PubMed ID: 31177469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Barriers to, and facilitators of, the adoption of a sugar sweetened beverage tax to prevent non-communicable diseases in Uganda: a policy landscape analysis.
Ahaibwe G; Abdool Karim S; Thow AM; Erzse A; Hofman K
Glob Health Action; 2021 Jan; 14(1):1892307. PubMed ID: 33874854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
