162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34682896)
1. Comparison of Preoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and 3D-Double Echo Steady-State MRI in Third Molar Surgery.
Valdec S; Al-Haj Husain A; Winklhofer S; Müller M; Piccirelli M; Stadlinger B
J Clin Med; 2021 Oct; 10(20):. PubMed ID: 34682896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is MRI a viable alternative to CT/CBCT to identify the course of the inferior alveolar nerve in relation to the roots of the third molars?
Beck F; Austermann S; Bertl K; Ulm C; Lettner S; Toelly A; Gahleitner A
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jun; 25(6):3861-3871. PubMed ID: 33289048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is 3T MR nerve-bone fusion imaging a viable alternative to MRI-CBCT to identify the relationship between the inferior alveolar nerve and mandibular third molar.
Huang H; Yan Y; Jiang D; Zhao X; Cao D; She D
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Apr; 28(5):256. PubMed ID: 38630324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: Intraosseous Localization of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Using 3D Double-Echo Steady-State MRI (3D-DESS).
Al-Haj Husain A; Stadlinger B; Winklhofer S; Müller M; Piccirelli M; Valdec S
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34359328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative visualization of the lingual nerve by 3D double-echo steady-state MRI in surgical third molar extraction treatment.
Al-Haj Husain A; Valdec S; Stadlinger B; Rücker M; Piccirelli M; Winklhofer S
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):2043-2053. PubMed ID: 34586501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative diagnosis in third molar surgery: a systematic review.
Al-Haj Husain A; Stadlinger B; Winklhofer S; Piccirelli M; Valdec S
Oral Radiol; 2023 Jan; 39(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 35397042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visualization of Inferior Alveolar and Lingual Nerve Pathology by 3D Double-Echo Steady-State MRI: Two Case Reports with Literature Review.
Al-Haj Husain A; Schönegg D; Valdec S; Stadlinger B; Gander T; Essig H; Piccirelli M; Winklhofer S
J Imaging; 2022 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 35324630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does additional cone beam computed tomography decrease the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury in high-risk cases undergoing third molar surgery?Does CBCT decrease the risk of IAN injury?
Korkmaz YT; Kayıpmaz S; Senel FC; Atasoy KT; Gumrukcu Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 46(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 28174060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.
Guerrero ME; Botetano R; Beltran J; Horner K; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):335-42. PubMed ID: 23494455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.
Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbance after impacted mandibular third molar evaluation using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography: a pilot study.
Guerrero ME; Nackaerts O; Beinsberger J; Horner K; Schoenaers J; Jacobs R;
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 70(10):2264-70. PubMed ID: 22705219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detecting direct inferior alveolar nerve - Third molar contact and canal decorticalization by cone-beam computed tomography to predict postoperative sensory impairment.
Bozkurt P; Görürgöz C
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 121(3):259-263. PubMed ID: 31325623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Degree of Compression of the Inferior Alveolar Canal on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Outcomes of Postoperative Nerve Injury in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery.
Sklavos A; Delpachitra S; Jaunay T; Kumar R; Chandu A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 79(5):974-980. PubMed ID: 33529607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
Lofthag-Hansen S
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and inferior alveolar nerve with dental 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Nakayama K; Nonoyama M; Takaki Y; Kagawa T; Yuasa K; Izumi K; Ozeki S; Ikebe T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 67(12):2587-91. PubMed ID: 19925976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-derived virtual 3-dimensional bone surface models of the mandible in comparison to computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography: A porcine cadaver study.
Probst FA; Burian E; Malenova Y; Lyutskanova P; Stumbaum MJ; Ritschl LM; Kronthaler S; Karampinos D; Probst M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Oct; 23(5):779-788. PubMed ID: 34318580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical relevance of cone beam computed tomography in mandibular third molar removal: A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Ghaeminia H; Gerlach NL; Hoppenreijs TJ; Kicken M; Dings JP; Borstlap WA; de Haan T; Bergé SJ; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2158-67. PubMed ID: 26596360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular canal-related parameters interpreted in panoramic images and CBCT of mandibular third molars as risk factors to predict sensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve.
Matzen LH; Petersen LB; Schropp L; Wenzel A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Aug; 48(8):1094-1101. PubMed ID: 30975577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
