These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34683317)

  • 1. Advancing 3D-Printed Microfluidics: Characterization of a Gas-Permeable, High-Resolution PDMS Resin for Stereolithography.
    Fleck E; Sunshine A; DeNatale E; Keck C; McCann A; Potkay J
    Micromachines (Basel); 2021 Oct; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 34683317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low-Viscosity Polydimethylsiloxane Resin for Facile 3D Printing of Elastomeric Microfluidics.
    Fleck E; Keck C; Ryszka K; DeNatale E; Potkay J
    Micromachines (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 37421006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-Resin Masked Stereolithography (MSLA) 3D Printing for Rapid and Inexpensive Prototyping of Microfluidic Chips with Integrated Functional Components.
    Ahmed I; Sullivan K; Priye A
    Biosensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 36005047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Desktop-Stereolithography 3D-Printing of a Poly(dimethylsiloxane)-Based Material with Sylgard-184 Properties.
    Bhattacharjee N; Parra-Cabrera C; Kim YT; Kuo AP; Folch A
    Adv Mater; 2018 May; 30(22):e1800001. PubMed ID: 29656459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sealing 3D-printed parts to poly(dimethylsiloxane) for simple fabrication of Microfluidic devices.
    Carrell CS; McCord CP; Wydallis RM; Henry CS
    Anal Chim Acta; 2020 Aug; 1124():78-84. PubMed ID: 32534678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation and comparison of resin materials in transparent DLP-printing for application in cell culture and organs-on-a-chip.
    Fritschen A; Bell AK; Königstein I; Stühn L; Stark RW; Blaeser A
    Biomater Sci; 2022 Apr; 10(8):1981-1994. PubMed ID: 35262097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of Photocurable IP-PDMS for Soft Micro Systems Fabricated by Two-Photon Polymerization 3D Printing.
    Srinivasaraghavan Govindarajan R; Sikulskyi S; Ren Z; Stark T; Kim D
    Polymers (Basel); 2023 Nov; 15(22):. PubMed ID: 38006101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advancing Tissue Culture with Light-Driven 3D-Printed Microfluidic Devices.
    Li X; Wang M; Davis TP; Zhang L; Qiao R
    Biosensors (Basel); 2024 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 38920605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a Custom-Made 3D Printing Protocol with Commercial Resins for Manufacturing Microfluidic Devices.
    Subirada F; Paoli R; Sierra-Agudelo J; Lagunas A; Rodriguez-Trujillo R; Samitier J
    Polymers (Basel); 2022 Jul; 14(14):. PubMed ID: 35890735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fabrication routes via projection stereolithography for 3D-printing of microfluidic geometries for nucleic acid amplification.
    Tzivelekis C; Sgardelis P; Waldron K; Whalley R; Huo D; Dalgarno K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240237. PubMed ID: 33112867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics.
    Bhattacharjee N; Urrios A; Kang S; Folch A
    Lab Chip; 2016 May; 16(10):1720-42. PubMed ID: 27101171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D printed mold leachates in PDMS microfluidic devices.
    de Almeida Monteiro Melo Ferraz M; Nagashima JB; Venzac B; Le Gac S; Songsasen N
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):994. PubMed ID: 31969661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applied tutorial for the design and fabrication of biomicrofluidic devices by resin 3D printing.
    Musgrove HB; Catterton MA; Pompano RR
    Anal Chim Acta; 2022 May; 1209():339842. PubMed ID: 35569850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D Printed Microfluidics.
    Nielsen AV; Beauchamp MJ; Nordin GP; Woolley AT
    Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif); 2020 Jun; 13(1):45-65. PubMed ID: 31821017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing Microfluidic Performance of Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Platforms.
    Macdonald NP; Cabot JM; Smejkal P; Guijt RM; Paull B; Breadmore MC
    Anal Chem; 2017 Apr; 89(7):3858-3866. PubMed ID: 28281349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Highly Fluorinated Methacrylates for Optical 3D Printing of Microfluidic Devices.
    Kotz F; Risch P; Helmer D; Rapp BE
    Micromachines (Basel); 2018 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 30424049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of 3D-Printed Moulds for Soft Lithography of Millifluidic Devices.
    Mohd Fuad N; Carve M; Kaslin J; Wlodkowic D
    Micromachines (Basel); 2018 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 30424050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3D Printing: An Alternative Microfabrication Approach with Unprecedented Opportunities in Design.
    Balakrishnan HK; Badar F; Doeven EH; Novak JI; Merenda A; Dumée LF; Loy J; Guijt RM
    Anal Chem; 2021 Jan; 93(1):350-366. PubMed ID: 33263392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effects of Polyaniline Nanofibers and Graphene Flakes on the Electrical Properties and Mechanical Properties of ABS-like Resin Composites Obtained by DLP 3D Printing.
    Jang S; Cho S
    Polymers (Basel); 2023 Jul; 15(14):. PubMed ID: 37514469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microfluidic devices manufacturing with a stereolithographic printer for biological applications.
    Carnero B; Bao-Varela C; Gómez-Varela AI; Álvarez E; Flores-Arias MT
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Oct; 129():112388. PubMed ID: 34579907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.