These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3468357)

  • 21. The gene politics of the European Community.
    Goerlich A; Krannich M
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(3):201-18. PubMed ID: 11652004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New Presidential National Bioethics Advisory Commission proposed.
    Crigger BJ
    IRB; 1994; 16(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11652792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Questions remain on German embryo protection.
    Zülicke F
    Bull Med Ethics; 1995 Jun; No. 109():16-8. PubMed ID: 11654281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. U.S. Bioethics Commission meets, outlines agenda.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Nov; 14(11):1533. PubMed ID: 11644890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. DNA: have the corporations already grabbed control of new life forms?
    Rifkin J
    Mother Jones; 1977; 2(2):23-39. PubMed ID: 11649384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Germany's past still casts a long shadow.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 1997 Oct; 389(6652):660. PubMed ID: 9338766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genetic engineering. New law needs changes made.
    Dickman S
    Nature; 1990 Jan; 343(6256):298. PubMed ID: 2300178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Senate hearing on the potential environmental consequences of genetic engineering.
    Milweski E
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1984 Dec; 7(4):189-203. PubMed ID: 6598875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Infectious diseases. WHO gives a cautious green light to smallpox experiments.
    Vogel G
    Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5700):1270-1. PubMed ID: 15550627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. DNA and the congressional prerogatives: proposals for a deliberate legislative approach to genetic research.
    English TL
    Indiana Law J; 1978; 53(3):571-84. PubMed ID: 11661591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Redesigning man: the dangerous experiment.
    Milton J
    Analog Sci Fict Sci Fact; 1978 Aug; 98(8):44-50+. PubMed ID: 11662518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Which ills to bear?: reevaluating the "threat" of modern genetics.
    Capron AM
    Emory Law J; 1990; 39(3):665-96. PubMed ID: 11653905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genetic engineering. Restrictions on industry eased.
    Neffe J
    Nature; 1985 Oct 10-16; 317(6037):469. PubMed ID: 3862968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Proposals for the future regulation of biotechnology in Australia.
    Neilson R
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 18(3):692-8. PubMed ID: 11654325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The recombinant DNA debate. [(Title provided[.
    McGarity T
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1979; 27(3):459-67. PubMed ID: 12083081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Genetic engineering. Dispute over monitoring.
    Webb B
    Nature; 1989 Sep; 341(6237):7. PubMed ID: 2770882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genetic engineering: Germany edges towards law.
    Dickman S
    Nature; 1989 Jun; 339(6223):327. PubMed ID: 2725653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genetic engineering regulation. Superpigs go to market.
    Ewing T
    Nature; 1990 May; 345(6274):377. PubMed ID: 2342568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genetic engineering: the flowers that bloom next spring.
    Dickman S
    Nature; 1989 Jun; 339(6223):325. PubMed ID: 2725648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Still looser UK guidelines.
    Nature; 1980 Sep; 287(5780):265-6. PubMed ID: 6932590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.