These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3468366)

  • 1. [Quality of amalgam and composite restorations: a literature review].
    Kroeze HJ; Ruiken HM; Plasschaert AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1986 Oct; 93(10):343-5. PubMed ID: 3468366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations.
    Full CA; Hollander WR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: two year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1983 Apr; 49(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 6344966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of composite and amalgam posterior restorations: one year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1982 Jan; 48(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 7034910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: three year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 Jun; 50(6):478-80. PubMed ID: 6378338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical evaluation of the quality of amalgam, acrylic and cast restorations. Results of a pilot study].
    Pieper K; Motsch A; Sennhenn S; Färbom L
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1988 Aug; 43(8):874-9. PubMed ID: 3255586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds?
    Plasmans PJ; Reukers EA
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8337184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The future of dental amalgam].
    Opdam NJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):373-5. PubMed ID: 16300323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical evaluation of composite restorations on the posterior teeth after 4 years].
    Prati C; Montanari G
    Minerva Stomatol; 1987 Oct; 36(10):765-9. PubMed ID: 3480412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amalgam--Resurrection and redemption. Part 1: the clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam.
    Wahl MJ
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):525-35. PubMed ID: 11495565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A two-year clinical study of a carvable composite resin used as class II restorations in primary molars.
    Tonn EM; Ryge G; Chambers DW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(6):405-13. PubMed ID: 7002965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
    Franchi M; Trisi P; Montanari G; Piattelli A
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Amalgam. IX. Substitute for amalgam: durability of composite restorations].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Oct; 100(10):437-41. PubMed ID: 11822139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Esthetic composite resin facings for amalgam restorations.
    Lambert RL; Scrabeck JG; Robinson FB
    Gen Dent; 1983; 31(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 6575935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
    Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The amalgam-free dental school.
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Loomans BA
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):371-7. PubMed ID: 15193785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A three-year clinical evaluation of composite resin and a high copper amalgam in posterior primary teeth.
    Nelson GV; Osborne JW; Gale EN; Norman RD; Phillips RW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(6):414-8. PubMed ID: 6934175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.