These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34684162)

  • 1. Long-Term Pain Characteristics and Management Following Minimally Invasive Spinal Decompression and Open Laminectomy and Fusion for Spinal Stenosis.
    Regev GJ; Leor G; Ankori R; Hochberg U; Ofir D; Khashan M; Kedem R; Lidar Z; Salame K
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 34684162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression and minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for one-level lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Hua W; Wang B; Ke W; Wu X; Zhang Y; Li S; Yang S; Yang C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Nov; 21(1):785. PubMed ID: 33246434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive compared with open lumbar laminotomy: no functional benefits at 6 or 24 months after surgery.
    Ang CL; Phak-Boon Tow B; Fook S; Guo CM; Chen JL; Yue WM; Tan SB
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1705-12. PubMed ID: 24094717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
    Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Feb; 30(2):234-241. PubMed ID: 30544348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Long-term results after undercutting decompression compared with decompressive laminectomy alone or with instrumented fusion.
    Rompe JD; Eysel P; Zöllner J; Nafe B; Heine J
    Neurosurg Rev; 1999 Oct; 22(2-3):102-6. PubMed ID: 10547007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with stenosis.
    Cheng X; Zhang K; Sun X; Zhao C; Li H; Ni B; Zhao J
    Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1127-1133. PubMed ID: 28416439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
    Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.
    Kotani Y; Abumi K; Ito M; Sudo H; Abe Y; Minami A
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21(6):1171-7. PubMed ID: 22173610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.
    Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Zheng WJ; Liu J
    Eur Spine J; 2011 Apr; 20(4):623-8. PubMed ID: 20927557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
    Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative scoliosis: Predictive factors of radiographic and clinical outcomes.
    Minamide A; Yoshida M; Iwahashi H; Simpson AK; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Kagotani R; Sonekatsu M; Sasaki T; Shinto K; Deguchi T
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 May; 22(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28161236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Primary MIS TLIF and MIS TLIF With Revision Decompression.
    Khechen B; Haws BE; Patel DV; Narain AS; Hijji FY; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Iyer S; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jan; 44(2):150-156. PubMed ID: 30562332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Simple Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach versus Instrumented Total Laminectomy and Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Kayalar AE; Onen MR; Gerilmez A; Naderi S
    Turk Neurosurg; 2019; 29(5):643-650. PubMed ID: 31353433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Ghogawala Z; Dziura J; Butler WE; Dai F; Terrin N; Magge SN; Coumans JV; Harrington JF; Amin-Hanjani S; Schwartz JS; Sonntag VK; Barker FG; Benzel EC
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1424-34. PubMed ID: 27074067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Iguchi T; Kurihara A; Nakayama J; Sato K; Kurosaka M; Yamasaki K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jul; 25(14):1754-9. PubMed ID: 10888941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.