These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34684162)

  • 21. Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Machado GC; Ferreira PH; Yoo RI; Harris IA; Pinheiro MB; Koes BW; van Tulder MW; Rzewuska M; Maher CG; Ferreira ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 11(11):CD012421. PubMed ID: 27801521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
    Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.
    Schöller K; Alimi M; Cong GT; Christos P; Härtl R
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):355-367. PubMed ID: 28362963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.
    Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The impact of pelvic balance, physical activity, and fear-avoidance on the outcome after decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar stenosis.
    Donnarumma P; Presaghi F; Tarantino R; Fragale M; Rullo M; Delfini R
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):428-433. PubMed ID: 27272492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of full-endoscopic and minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in the setting of degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.
    Hasan S; McGrath LB; Sen RD; Barber JK; Hofstetter CP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E16. PubMed ID: 31042656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cost-utility analysis of minimally invasive versus open multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Davis BJ; Fulchiero E; Aaronson O; Cheng J; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Feb; 26(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 21959840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Decompression only versus fusion surgery for lumbar stenosis in elderly patients over 75 years old: which is reasonable?
    Lee CH; Hyun SJ; Kim KJ; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2013; 53(12):870-4. PubMed ID: 24172588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Iatrogenic spondylolisthesis following laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis: systematic review and current concepts.
    Guha D; Heary RF; Shamji MF
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E9. PubMed ID: 26424349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Difference in Surgical Site Infection Rates Between Open and Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Pathology: A Retrospective Single Center Experience of 1442 Cases.
    Mueller K; Zhao D; Johnson O; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
    Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2019 Jun; 16(6):750-755. PubMed ID: 30107559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Gelalis ID; Arnaoutoglou C; Christoforou G; Lykissas MG; Batsilas I; Xenakis T
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 21088465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Full-endoscopic (bi-portal or uni-portal) versus microscopic lumbar decompression laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Pairuchvej S; Muljadi JA; Ho JC; Arirachakaran A; Kongtharvonskul J
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 May; 30(4):595-611. PubMed ID: 31863273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Outcomes of multisegmental transforaminal enlarged decompression plus posterior pedicle screw fixation for multilevel lumbar spinal canal stenosis associated with lumbar instability.
    Sun C; Tian WJ; Liu HX; Guan PG
    Int J Surg; 2018 Feb; 50():72-78. PubMed ID: 29329787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Short-term effects of minimally invasive dynamic neutralization system for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: An observational study.
    Tu J; Hua W; Li W; Liu W; Luo R; Li S; Zhang Y; Kang L; Wang K; Song Y; Yang S; Yang C
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(22):e10854. PubMed ID: 29851799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study.
    Lønne G; Johnsen LG; Rossvoll I; Andresen H; Storheim K; Zwart JA; Nygaard ØP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 25575084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Phan K; Mobbs RJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E91-E100. PubMed ID: 26555839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally Invasive vs. Open Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Patients with Diabetes - A Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network Study.
    Hathi K; Bigney E; Richardson E; Alugo T; El-Mughayyar D; Vandewint A; Manson N; Abraham E; Small C; Thomas K; Fisher CG; Rampersaud YR; Hall H; McIntosh G; Johnson MG; Bailey CS; Weber MH; Paquet J; Kingwell S; Nataraj A; Finkelstein J; Kelly A; Attabib N
    Global Spine J; 2023 Jul; 13(6):1602-1611. PubMed ID: 34463136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.