These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34684392)

  • 1. Web-Based Personalized Nutrition System for Delivering Dietary Feedback Based on Behavior Change Techniques: Development and Pilot Study among Dietitians.
    Murakami K; Shinozaki N; Masayasu S; Livingstone MBE
    Nutrients; 2021 Sep; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 34684392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Dietary Feedback System for the Delivery of Consistent Personalized Dietary Advice in the Web-Based Multicenter Food4Me Study.
    Forster H; Walsh MC; O'Donovan CB; Woolhead C; McGirr C; Daly EJ; O'Riordan R; Celis-Morales C; Fallaize R; Macready AL; Marsaux CF; Navas-Carretero S; San-Cristobal R; Kolossa S; Hartwig K; Mavrogianni C; Tsirigoti L; Lambrinou CP; Godlewska M; Surwiłło A; Gjelstad IM; Drevon CA; Manios Y; Traczyk I; Martinez JA; Saris WH; Daniel H; Lovegrove JA; Mathers JC; Gibney MJ; Gibney ER; Brennan L
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jun; 18(6):e150. PubMed ID: 27363307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of Web-Based Personalized Nutrition Advice for Adults Using the eNutri Web App: Evidence From the EatWellUK Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Zenun Franco R; Fallaize R; Weech M; Hwang F; Lovegrove JA
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Apr; 24(4):e29088. PubMed ID: 35468093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Internet-based tools to assess diet and provide feedback in chronic kidney disease stage IV: a pilot study.
    Murali S; Arab L; Vargas R; Rastogi A; Ang A; Shetty N
    J Ren Nutr; 2013 Mar; 23(2):e33-42. PubMed ID: 22819321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Assessment of a Personalized Nutrition Tool (eNutri) in Germany: Pilot Study on Usability Metrics and Users' Experiences.
    Kaiser B; Stelzl T; Finglas P; Gedrich K
    JMIR Form Res; 2022 Aug; 6(8):e34497. PubMed ID: 35925664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship of nutrition knowledge and self-reported dietary behaviors with urinary excretion of sodium and potassium: comparison between dietitians and nondietitians.
    Sugimoto M; Asakura K; Masayasu S; Sasaki S
    Nutr Res; 2016 May; 36(5):440-51. PubMed ID: 27101762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The website-based eaTracker® 'My Goals' feature: a qualitative evaluation.
    Lieffers JR; Haresign H; Mehling C; Arocha JF; Hanning RM
    Public Health Nutr; 2017 Apr; 20(5):859-869. PubMed ID: 27989260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating the Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Technology-Delivered Personalized Feedback on Dietary Patterns in Young Australian Adults in the Advice, Ideas, and Motivation for My Eating (Aim4Me) Study: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Haslam RL; Pezdirc K; Truby H; Attia J; Hutchesson M; Burrows T; Callister R; Hides L; Bonevski B; Kerr DA; Lubans D; Kirkpatrick S; Rollo M; McCaffrey T; Collins CE
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2020 May; 9(5):e15999. PubMed ID: 32441659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptions of genetic testing for personalized nutrition: a randomized trial of DNA-based dietary advice.
    Nielsen DE; Shih S; El-Sohemy A
    J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics; 2014; 7(2):94-104. PubMed ID: 25170902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personalized Web-Based Weight Loss Behavior Change Program With and Without Dietitian Online Coaching for Adults With Overweight and Obesity: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Beleigoli A; Andrade AQ; Diniz MF; Ribeiro AL
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Nov; 22(11):e17494. PubMed ID: 33151151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Formative evaluation of the dietary assessment component of Children's and Adolescents' Nutrition Assessment and Advice on the Web (CANAA-W).
    Vereecken C; Covents M; Maes L; Moyson T
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2014 Jan; 27 Suppl 1():54-65. PubMed ID: 23980931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility of Reviewing Digital Food Images for Dietary Assessment among Nutrition Professionals.
    Fatehah AA; Poh BK; Shanita SN; Wong JE
    Nutrients; 2018 Jul; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 30060528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relatively severe misreporting of sodium, potassium, and protein intake among female dietitians compared with nondietitians.
    Sugimoto M; Asakura K; Masayasu S; Sasaki S
    Nutr Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):818-26. PubMed ID: 27440536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Web-based and mailed questionnaires: a comparison of response rates and compliance.
    Bälter KA; Bälter O; Fondell E; Lagerros YT
    Epidemiology; 2005 Jul; 16(4):577-9. PubMed ID: 15951679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequent Nutritional Feedback, Personalized Advice, and Behavioral Changes: Findings from the European Food4Me Internet-Based RCT.
    Celis-Morales C; Livingstone KM; Petermann-Rocha F; Navas-Carretero S; San-Cristobal R; O'Donovan CB; Moschonis G; Manios Y; Traczyk I; Drevon CA; Daniel H; Marsaux CFM; Saris WHM; Fallaize R; Macready AL; Lovegrove JA; Gibney M; Gibney ER; Walsh M; Brennan L; Martinez JA; Mathers JC;
    Am J Prev Med; 2019 Aug; 57(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 31248745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Formative evaluation of the feedback component of Children's and Adolescents' Nutrition Assessment and Advice on the Web (CANAA-W) among parents of schoolchildren.
    Vereecken C; Covents M; Maes L; Moyson T
    Public Health Nutr; 2013 Jan; 16(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 23174271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feedback in web-based questionnaires as incentive to increase compliance in studies on lifestyle factors.
    Bälter O; Fondell E; Bälter K
    Public Health Nutr; 2012 Jun; 15(6):982-8. PubMed ID: 22122870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative analysis of the contributions of nutritionists to the development of an online instrument for monitoring the food intake of schoolchildren.
    Davies VF; Kupek E; de Assis MA; Engel R; da Costa FF; Di Pietro PF; Natal S; Thompson D; Baranowski T
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2015 Jan; 28 Suppl 1():65-72. PubMed ID: 24480047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Care by Midwives, Obstetricians, and Dietitians for Pregnant Women Following a Strict Plant-Based Diet: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Meulenbroeks D; Versmissen I; Prins N; Jonkers D; Gubbels J; Scheepers H
    Nutrients; 2021 Jul; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 34371909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The acceptability of repeat Internet-based hybrid diet assessment of previous 24-h dietary intake: administration of the Oxford WebQ in UK Biobank.
    Galante J; Adamska L; Young A; Young H; Littlejohns TJ; Gallacher J; Allen N
    Br J Nutr; 2016 Feb; 115(4):681-6. PubMed ID: 26652593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.