These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3468472)

  • 21. A comparison of Flow and Kodak dental X-ray films by means of perceptibility curves.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1993 Apr; 51(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 8498162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of storage conditions on film characteristics of Ektaspeed plus and Ultra-speed films.
    Platin E; Nesbit SP; Ludlow JB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Feb; 130(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 10036844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. E-speed dental films processed with rapid chemistry: a comparison with D-speed film.
    Kaffe I; Gratt BM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Sep; 64(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 3477753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on sensitometric properties of ULTRA-SPEED and EKTASPEED films.
    Hashimoto K; Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jan; 71(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 1994314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The evaluation of effect of developer age in the detection of approximal caries using three speed dental x-ray films: an in-vitro study.
    Madalli VB; Annigeri RG; Basavaraddi SM
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Mar; 8(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 24783146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimal processing of Ektaspeed dental film.
    Fjellström CA; Fredholm U; Julin P; Rehnmark S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(4):137-43. PubMed ID: 3466376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparative study of very high speed dental films].
    Benz C
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Sep; 44(9):728-30. PubMed ID: 2637857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of Ultraspeed and Ektaspeed dental x-ray film: in vitro study of the radiographic appearance of interproximal lesions.
    Kleier DJ; Hicks MJ; Flaitz CM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Mar; 63(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 3473366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceived quality of radiographic images after rapid processing of D- and F-speed direct-exposure intraoral x-ray films.
    Bernstein DI; Clark SJ; Scheetz JP; Farman AG; Rosenson B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 14561976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is E-speed dental film more sensitive to storage than D-speed dental film?
    Petersson A; Lindh C; Nilsson M
    Swed Dent J; 1987; 11(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 3480614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Densitometric evaluation of three x-ray films with five different developing solutions.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Tamse A; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Feb; 57(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 6583629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of time and exposure to air on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of three rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE; Prinsloo NJ; Swart NG
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Jan; 48(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9511608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of automated nonroller processing on the sensitometric characteristics of 3 intraoral film types.
    Geist JR; Brand JW; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jul; 96(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 12847452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [New film for intraoral radiography].
    Verdonschot EH; Duijsings JH
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2001 Apr; 108(4):142-4. PubMed ID: 11383356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sensitometric comparison of dental films of groups D and E.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Aug; 54(2):250-2. PubMed ID: 6956842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of manual and automatic processing in general dental practice.
    Rout PG; Rogers SN; Chapman M; Rippin JW
    Br Dent J; 1996 Aug; 181(3):99-101. PubMed ID: 8810109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A clinical comparison of speed group D and E dental x-ray films.
    Horton PS; Sippy FH; Kohout FJ; Nelson JF; Kienzle GC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jul; 58(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 6589567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.