These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3468527)

  • 1. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique.
    Lutz E; Krejci I; Oldenburg TR
    Quintessence Int; 1986 Dec; 17(12):777-84. PubMed ID: 3468527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading.
    Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 17767951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A mathematical analysis of shrinkage stress development in dental composite restorations during resin polymerization.
    Li J; Li H; Fok SL
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 18191446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resin pins: a novel composite resin concept for treatment of posterior teeth--technical presentation.
    de Almeida BC; de Almeida RS
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 20(8):507-11; quiz 512. PubMed ID: 18990903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations.
    Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Bambi C; Grandini R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):79-88. PubMed ID: 16957794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Handling of mechanical stresses in composite restorations.
    Davidson CL; Davidson-Kaban SS
    Dent Update; 1998 Sep; 25(7):274-9. PubMed ID: 10478021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations.
    Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of cooled composite inserts in the sealing ability of resin composite restorations placed at intraoral temperatures: an in vitro study.
    de la Torre-Moreno FJ; Rosales-Leal JI; Bravo M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 12760702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A rational use of dental materials in posterior direct resin restorations in order to control polymerization shrinkage stress.
    Giachetti L; Bertini F; Bambi C; Scaminaci Russo D
    Minerva Stomatol; 2007 Mar; 56(3):129-38. PubMed ID: 17327817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managing stress with composite resin, Part 1: The restorative-tooth interface.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF
    Dent Today; 2006 Dec; 25(12):98, 100-4; quiz 104. PubMed ID: 17193798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The axial bevel technique: a new technique for extensive posterior resin composite restorations.
    Liebenberg WH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 11203930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct posterior composite restorations: simplified success through a systematic approach.
    Koczarski MJ; Corredor AC
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002; 14(1):87-94; quiz 96. PubMed ID: 11905163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct resin composites for 2002 and beyond.
    Small BW
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 12029793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of material properties of composite restoration on the strength of the restoration-dentine interface due to polymerization shrinkage, thermal and occlusal loading.
    Borkowski K; Kotousov A; Kahler B
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jul; 29(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 17000129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Restoring proximal integrity in posterior composite resin restorations: innovations using Ceromers.
    Liebenberg WH
    SADJ; 1998 Mar; 53(3):129-38. PubMed ID: 9722413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A repaired posterior restorative composite resin filling compared to the posterior restorative composite resin].
    Ozawa R; Yokoyama M; Matsubara H; Kawasaki N; Harano A; Matsumea I; Sasaki N; Shinohara S; Inoue T
    Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1985 Dec; 17(2):318-26. PubMed ID: 3915002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Placement technique for direct posterior composite restorations.
    Javaheri DS
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):195-200; quiz 202. PubMed ID: 11360766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
    Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An advance in condensable composites.
    Munoz-Viveros CA
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (23):S3-5. PubMed ID: 12089755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.