These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34687054)

  • 1. Remote magnetic navigation versus manual catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A single center long-term comparison.
    Schlögl S; Schlögl KS; Haarmann H; Bengel P; Bergau L; Rasenack E; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Jan; 45(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 34687054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy and safety of remote magnetic catheter navigation vs. manual steerable sheath-guided ablation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a case-control study.
    Koutalas E; Bertagnolli L; Sommer P; Richter S; Rolf S; Breithardt O; Bollmann A; Hindricks G; Arya A
    Europace; 2015 Feb; 17(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 25336662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
    Lüthje L; Vollmann D; Seegers J; Dorenkamp M; Sohns C; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 100(11):1003-11. PubMed ID: 21706198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic navigation system: a single-centre prospective study.
    Da Costa A; Ben H'dech M; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Bisch L; Gate-Martinet A; Levallois M; Isaaz K
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2013; 106(8-9):423-32. PubMed ID: 23906679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Remote magnetic navigation versus manual control navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jia K; Jin Q; Liu A; Wu L
    J Electrocardiol; 2019; 55():78-86. PubMed ID: 31152995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation with irrigated tip catheter using remote magnetic navigation compared with conventional manual method.
    Ghadban R; Gifft K; Luebbering Z; Sodhi S; Cooper D; Enezate T
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2021 Oct; 62(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 32959178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term outcomes of the current remote magnetic catheter navigation technique for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Yuan S; Holmqvist F; Kongstad O; Jensen SM; Wang L; Ljungström E; Hertervig E; Borgquist R
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2017 Dec; 51(6):308-315. PubMed ID: 28958165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Remote magnetic with open-irrigated catheter vs. manual navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Proietti R; Pecoraro V; Di Biase L; Natale A; Santangeli P; Viecca M; Sagone A; Galli A; Moja L; Tagliabue L
    Europace; 2013 Sep; 15(9):1241-8. PubMed ID: 23585253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feasibility and safety of remote-controlled magnetic navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Katsiyiannis WT; Melby DP; Matelski JL; Ervin VL; Laverence KL; Gornick CC
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Dec; 102(12):1674-6. PubMed ID: 19064022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial experience of a novel mapping system combined with remote magnetic navigation in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Lin C; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen X
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1387-1392. PubMed ID: 28862806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Remote Magnetic Irrigated Tip Ablation versus Manual Catheter Irrigated Tip Catheter Ablation With and Without Force Sensing Feedback.
    Weiss JP; May HT; Bair TL; Crandall BG; Cutler MJ; Day JD; Osborn JS; Mallender C; Bunch TJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S5-S10. PubMed ID: 26969224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Remote magnetic catheter navigation for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with common-type atrial flutter.
    Vollmann D; Lüthje L; Seegers J; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2009 Dec; 2(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 20009074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-ring ablation compared with standard circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using remote magnetic catheter navigation.
    Sohns C; Bergau L; Seegers J; Lüthje L; Vollmann D; Zabel M
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Oct; 41(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 24943245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Remote magnetic navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation: single-catheter technique or additional use of a circular mapping catheter?
    Vollmann D; Lüthje L; Seegers J; Sohns C; Sossalla S; Sohns J; Röver C; Hasenfuß G; Zabel M
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Oct; 41(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 24893795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does a patent foramen ovale matter when using a remote-controlled magnetic system for pulmonary vein isolation?
    Gate-Martinet A; Da Costa A; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Bisch L; Levallois M; Isaaz K
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2014 Feb; 107(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 24556188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Atrial fibrillation ablation using remote magnetic navigation and the risk of atrial-esophageal fistula: international multicenter experience.
    Danon A; Shurrab M; Nair KM; Latcu DG; Arruda MS; Chen X; Szili-Torok T; Rossvol O; Wissner EE; Lashevsky I; Crystal E
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 43(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 25935226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of catheter ablation with remote magnetic navigation on procedural outcomes in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Jin Q; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen X
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Nov; 44(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 26216480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term efficacy of single procedure remote magnetic catheter navigation for ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia: a retrospective study.
    Dinov B; Schönbauer R; Wojdyla-Hordynska A; Braunschweig F; Richter S; Altmann D; Sommer P; Gaspar T; Bollmann A; Wetzel U; Rolf S; Piorkowski C; Hindricks G; Arya A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 May; 23(5):499-505. PubMed ID: 22313170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy and Safety of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation: Experience from 1,006 Procedures.
    Jin QI; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen XU
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S23-8. PubMed ID: 26969219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of atrial fibrillation ablation efficacy using remote magnetic navigation vs. manual navigation with contact-force control.
    Jez J; Jadczyk T; Lehar F; Pesl M; Kulik T; Belaskova S; Soucek F; Caluori G; Wojakowski W; Starek Z
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2020 Dec; 164(4):387-393. PubMed ID: 31645769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.