247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34687073)
1. QSMxT: Robust masking and artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Stewart AW; Robinson SD; O'Brien K; Jin J; Widhalm G; Hangel G; Walls A; Goodwin J; Eckstein K; Tourell M; Morgan C; Narayanan A; Barth M; Bollmann S
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Mar; 87(3):1289-1300. PubMed ID: 34687073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range.
Wei H; Dibb R; Zhou Y; Sun Y; Xu J; Wang N; Liu C
NMR Biomed; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1294-303. PubMed ID: 26313885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical Note: Optimization of quantitative susceptibility mapping by streaking artifact detection.
Wu ML; Wang CK; Lin PY; Chao TC
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5715-5722. PubMed ID: 32945538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction using annihilating filter-based low-rank Hankel matrix approach.
Ahn HS; Park SH; Ye JC
Magn Reson Med; 2020 Mar; 83(3):858-871. PubMed ID: 31468595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. QSMART: Quantitative susceptibility mapping artifact reduction technique.
Yaghmaie N; Syeda WT; Wu C; Zhang Y; Zhang TD; Burrows EL; Brodtmann A; Moffat BA; Wright DK; Glarin R; Kolbe S; Johnston LA
Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117701. PubMed ID: 33484853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Streaking artifact suppression of quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstructions via L1-norm data fidelity optimization (L1-QSM).
Milovic C; Lambert M; Langkammer C; Bredies K; Irarrazaval P; Tejos C
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Jan; 87(1):457-473. PubMed ID: 34350634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phase-based masking for quantitative susceptibility mapping of the human brain at 9.4T.
Hagberg GE; Eckstein K; Tuzzi E; Zhou J; Robinson S; Scheffler K
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Nov; 88(5):2267-2276. PubMed ID: 35754142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiecho complex total field inversion method (mcTFI) for improved signal modeling in quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Wen Y; Spincemaille P; Nguyen T; Cho J; Kovanlikaya I; Anderson J; Wu G; Yang B; Fung M; Li K; Kelley D; Benhamo N; Wang Y
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Oct; 86(4):2165-2178. PubMed ID: 34028868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Algorithms: Mathematical Rationale and Computational Implementations.
Kee Y; Liu Z; Zhou L; Dimov A; Cho J; de Rochefort L; Seo JK; Wang Y
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2531-2545. PubMed ID: 28885147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain.
Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z
J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep learning-based quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in the presence of fat using synthetically generated multi-echo phase training data.
Hanspach J; Bollmann S; Grigo J; Karius A; Uder M; Laun FB
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Oct; 88(4):1548-1560. PubMed ID: 35713187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Weak-harmonic regularization for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Milovic C; Bilgic B; Zhao B; Langkammer C; Tejos C; Acosta-Cabronero J
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Feb; 81(2):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 30265767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating the accuracy and precision of TE-dependent versus multi-echo QSM using Laplacian-based methods at 3 T.
Biondetti E; Karsa A; Thomas DL; Shmueli K
Magn Reson Med; 2020 Dec; 84(6):3040-3053. PubMed ID: 32491224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Li W; Wang N; Yu F; Han H; Cao W; Romero R; Tantiwongkosi B; Duong TQ; Liu C
Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():111-22. PubMed ID: 25536496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Background field removal technique based on non-regularized variable kernels sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Kan H; Arai N; Takizawa M; Omori K; Kasai H; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():94-101. PubMed ID: 29902566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method.
Kiersnowski OC; Karsa A; Wastling SJ; Thornton JS; Shmueli K
Magn Reson Med; 2023 May; 89(5):1791-1808. PubMed ID: 36480002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using a superposed dipole inversion method: Application to intracranial hemorrhage.
Sun H; Kate M; Gioia LC; Emery DJ; Butcher K; Wilman AH
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Sep; 76(3):781-91. PubMed ID: 26414757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Whole head quantitative susceptibility mapping using a least-norm direct dipole inversion method.
Sun H; Ma Y; MacDonald ME; Pike GB
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():166-175. PubMed ID: 29906634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhancing k-space quantitative susceptibility mapping by enforcing consistency on the cone data (CCD) with structural priors.
Wen Y; Wang Y; Liu T
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Feb; 75(2):823-30. PubMed ID: 25752805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving quantitative susceptibility mapping for the identification of traumatic brain injury neurodegeneration at the individual level.
Domínguez D JF; Stewart A; Burmester A; Akhlaghi H; O'Brien K; Bollmann S; Caeyenberghs K
Z Med Phys; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38336583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
