These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34687137)
1. Repeat MRI during active surveillance: natural history of prostatic lesions and upgrading rates. Luzzago S; Piccinelli ML; Mistretta FA; Bianchi R; Cozzi G; Di Trapani E; Cioffi A; Catellani M; Fontana M; Jannello LMI; Botticelli FMG; Marvaso G; Alessi S; Pricolo P; Ferro M; Matei DV; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Fusco N; Petralia G; de Cobelli O; Musi G BJU Int; 2022 Apr; 129(4):524-533. PubMed ID: 34687137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer upgrading with serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging and repeat biopsy in men on active surveillance: are confirmatory biopsies still necessary? Osses DF; Drost FH; Verbeek JFM; Luiting HB; van Leenders GJLH; Bangma CH; Krestin GP; Roobol MJ; Schoots IG BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 32232921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Subsequent Biopsy in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance. Hsiang W; Ghabili K; Syed JS; Holder J; Nguyen KA; Suarez-Sarmiento A; Huber S; Leapman MS; Sprenkle PC Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 31147263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings. Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Cozzi G; Peveri G; Bagnardi V; Catellani M; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Pricolo P; Conti A; Alessi S; Marvaso G; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 32150328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI-based PI-RADS score predicts ISUP upgrading and adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in men with biopsy ISUP 1 prostate cancer. Dekalo S; Mazliah O; Barkai E; Bar-Yosef Y; Herzberg H; Bashi T; Fahoum I; Barnes S; Sofer M; Yossepowitch O; Keren-Paz G; Mano R Can J Urol; 2024 Aug; 31(4):11955-11962. PubMed ID: 39217520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unified model involving genomics, magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density outperforms individual co-variables at predicting biopsy upgrading in patients on active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. Beksac AT; Ratnani P; Dovey Z; Parekh S; Falagario U; Roshandel R; Sobotka S; Kewlani D; Davis A; Weil R; Bashorun H; Jambor I; Lewis S; Haines K; Tewari AK Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 Mar; 5(3):e1492. PubMed ID: 34931468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging facilitates reclassification during active surveillance for prostate cancer. Fujihara A; Iwata T; Shakir A; Tafuri A; Cacciamani GE; Gill K; Ashrafi A; Ukimura O; Desai M; Duddalwar V; Stern MS; Aron M; Palmer SL; Gill IS; Abreu AL BJU Int; 2021 Jun; 127(6):712-721. PubMed ID: 33043575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical performance of magnetic resonance imaging and biomarkers for prostate cancer diagnosis in men at high genetic risk. Cussenot O; Renard-Penna R; Montagne S; Ondet V; Pilon A; Guechot J; Comperat E; Hamdy F; Lamb A; Cancel-Tassin G BJU Int; 2023 Jun; 131(6):745-754. PubMed ID: 36648168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the risk stratification of men with Grade Group 1 prostate cancer on active surveillance. Mamawala MK; Meyer AR; Landis PK; Macura KJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Carter BH; Gorin MA BJU Int; 2020 Jun; 125(6):861-866. PubMed ID: 32039537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiparametric Magnetic-Resonance to Confirm Eligibility to an Active Surveillance Program for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Intermediate Time Results of a Third Referral High Volume Centre Active Surveillance Protocol. Luzzago S; Musi G; Catellani M; Russo A; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Bianchi R; Cozzi G; Conti A; Pricolo P; Ferro M; Matei DV; Mirone V; Petralia G; de Cobelli O Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 29734177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Active Surveillance Without Annual Rebiopsy in Patients with Grade Group 1 or 2 Prostate Cancer: The Prospective PROMM-AS Study. Valentin B; Arsov C; Ullrich T; Al-Monajjed R; Boschheidgen M; Hadaschik BA; Giganti F; Giessing M; Lopez-Cotarelo C; Esposito I; Antoch G; Albers P; Radtke JP; Schimmöller L Eur Urol Open Sci; 2024 Jan; 59():30-38. PubMed ID: 38298772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Follow-up of Patients Included in Active Surveillance Protocol. Can PSA Density Discriminate Patients at Different Risk of Reclassification? Roscigno M; Stabile A; Lughezzani G; Pepe P; Galosi AB; Naselli A; Naspro R; Nicolai M; La Croce G; Aljoulani M; Perugini G; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Balzarini L; Sironi S; Da Pozzo LF Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Dec; 18(6):e698-e704. PubMed ID: 32493676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRI at diagnostic versus confirmatory biopsy during MRI-based active surveillance of prostate cancer. Marras M; Ellis JL; Copelan O; Naha U; Han T; Rac G; Quek ML; Gorbonos A; Woods ME; Flanigan RC; Gupta GN; Patel HD Urol Oncol; 2024 Oct; 42(10):331.e1-331.e6. PubMed ID: 38890040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting. Hansen NL; Barrett T; Koo B; Doble A; Gnanapragasam V; Warren A; Kastner C; Bratt O BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):724-730. PubMed ID: 27488931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Serial Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer. Chu CE; Cowan JE; Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Fasulo V; de la Calle CM; Shinohara K; Westphalen AC; Carroll PR Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):537-543. PubMed ID: 33483265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI-targeted or systematic random biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy naïve patients: follow-up of a PRECISION trial-like retrospective cohort. Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Mistretta FA; Piccinelli ML; Lorusso V; Morelli M; Bianchi R; Catellani M; Cozzi G; Di Trapani E; Pricolo P; Alessi S; Ferro M; Marvaso G; Matei DV; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Jun; 24(2):406-413. PubMed ID: 32989259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Annual mpMRI surveillance: PI-RADS upgrading and increasing trend correlated with patients who harbor clinically significant disease. Greenberg JW; Koller CR; Lightfoot C; Brinkley GJ; Leinwand G; Wang J; Krane LS Urol Oncol; 2024 May; 42(5):158.e11-158.e16. PubMed ID: 38365461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]