These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34687343)

  • 1. Variables measured on three-dimensional computed tomography are preferred for predicting the outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy.
    Kobayashi M; Waseda Y; Fuse H; Takazawa R
    World J Urol; 2022 Feb; 40(2):569-575. PubMed ID: 34687343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.
    Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
    Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.
    Langenauer J; Betschart P; Hechelhammer L; Güsewell S; Schmid HP; Engeler DS; Abt D; Zumstein V
    World J Urol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):2073-2080. PubMed ID: 29845319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
    Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.
    Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H
    J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.
    Celik S; Bozkurt O; Kaya FG; Egriboyun S; Demir O; Secil M; Celebi I
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jan; 47(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25311505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Predictive Role of Abdominal Fat Parameters and Stone Density on SWL Outcomes.
    Kaya C; Kaynak Y; Karabag A; Aykaç A
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2020; 16(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 31989897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations.
    Akkaş F; Culha MG; Ayten A; Danacıoğlu YO; Yildiz Ö; İnci E; Guner E; Şahin S
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Mar; 46(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 35184987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computed Tomography-Based Novel Prediction Model for the Outcome of Shockwave Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteral Stones.
    Park HS; Gong MK; Yoon CY; Moon du G; Cheon J; Choi YD
    J Endourol; 2016 Jul; 30(7):810-6. PubMed ID: 27042952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones.
    Kang DH; Cho KS; Ham WS; Chung DY; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY
    Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Nov; 57(6):408-416. PubMed ID: 27847914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting the Efficacy of Repeated Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treating Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Calculi Using an Artificial Neural Network Model.
    Peng Z; Wen M; Li Y; He T; Wang J; Zhang T
    Urol J; 2024 Jun; 21(4):234-241. PubMed ID: 38629197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters for Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcome in Upper Urinary Tract Stone Cases.
    Yamashita S; Kohjimoto Y; Iwahashi Y; Iguchi T; Nishizawa S; Kikkawa K; Hara I
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():9253952. PubMed ID: 30627582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The usefulness of the maximum Hounsfield units (HU) in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome for ureteral stones and the proposal of novel indicators using the maximum HU.
    Sugino Y; Kato T; Furuya S; Sasaki T; Arima K; Sugimura Y
    Urolithiasis; 2020 Feb; 48(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 30859262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.
    Garg M; Johnson H; Lee SM; Rai BP; Somani B; Philip J
    Curr Urol Rep; 2023 Apr; 24(4):173-185. PubMed ID: 36802317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. External Validation of Triple D Score in an Elderly (≥65 Years) Population for Prediction of Success Following Shockwave Lithotripsy.
    Gökce MI; Esen B; Gülpınar B; Süer E; Gülpınar Ö
    J Endourol; 2016 Sep; 30(9):1009-16. PubMed ID: 27392789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simple and practical nomograms for predicting the stone-free rate after shock wave lithotripsy in patients with a solitary upper ureteral stone.
    Niwa N; Matsumoto K; Miyahara M; Omura M; Kobayashi H; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Miyata K; Oya M
    World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1455-1461. PubMed ID: 28220189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional mean stone density on non-contrast computed tomography can predict ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome in ureteral stone cases.
    Yamashita S; Iwahashi Y; Deguchi R; Kikkawa K; Kohjimoto Y; Hara I
    Urolithiasis; 2020 Dec; 48(6):547-552. PubMed ID: 31993690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-Dimensional Texture Analysis with Machine Learning Provides Incremental Predictive Information for Successful Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Kidney Stones.
    Mannil M; von Spiczak J; Hermanns T; Poyet C; Alkadhi H; Fankhauser CD
    J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):829-836. PubMed ID: 29673945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of bioelectric impedance analysis on the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Keser F; Culpan M; Cakici MC; Atis RG; Yildirim A
    Urolithiasis; 2023 Jul; 51(1):93. PubMed ID: 37400587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do we really need kidneys-ureters-bladder radiography to predict stone radiopacity before treatment with shockwave lithotripsy? Development and internal validation of a novel predictive model based on computed tomography parameters.
    Sfoungaristos S; Hidas G; Gofrit ON; Yutkin V; Latke A; Landau EH; Pode D; Duvdevani M
    J Endourol; 2015 May; 29(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 25945651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.