135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34688146)
1. The effect of dental restoration geometry and material properties on biomechanical behaviour of a treated molar tooth: A 3D finite element analysis.
Babaei B; Shouha P; Birman V; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty G
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Jan; 125():104892. PubMed ID: 34688146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of dental restoration depth, internal cavity angle, and material properties on biomechanical resistance of a treated molar tooth.
Babaei B; Cella S; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty BG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Sep; 133():105305. PubMed ID: 35700676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancing the mechanical stability of restored teeth with interfacial cracks: Finite element analysis.
Babaei B; Prusty BG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Dec; 148():106191. PubMed ID: 37847958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-response optimisation analysis of material properties in dental restorative composites under the influence of thermal and thermomechanical stimuli - A 3D finite element study.
Thadathil Varghese J; Islam F; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty BG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 150():106363. PubMed ID: 38169207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of thermal and thermomechanical stimuli on a molar tooth treated with resin-based restorative dental composites.
Thadathil Varghese J; Babaei B; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty BG
Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):811-823. PubMed ID: 35450702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Gloria A; Lanzotti A; Maietta S; Martorelli M
Dent Mater; 2017 Jan; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 27890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations.
Arola D; Galles LA; Sarubin MF
J Dent; 2001 Jan; 29(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 11137640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Martorelli M; Sorrentino R; Gloria A
Am J Dent; 2017 Aug; 30(4):227-232. PubMed ID: 29178706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Direct and Indirect Materials on Stress Distribution in Class II MOD Restorations: A 3D-Finite Element Analysis Study.
Alp Ş; Gulec Alagoz L; Ulusoy N
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7435054. PubMed ID: 33381580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical performance of resin composite on dental tissue restoration: A finite element analysis.
Ouldyerou A; Mehboob H; Mehboob A; Merdji A; Aminallah L; Mukdadi OM; Barsoum I; Junaedi H
PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295582. PubMed ID: 38128035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of two CAD/CAM materials for Nayyar core and post-retained restorations: Three dimensional stress analysis.
Ulusoy N; Gulec Alagoz L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 May; 117():104381. PubMed ID: 33582503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of restoration volume on stresses in a mandibular molar: a finite element study.
Wayne JS; Chande R; Porter HC; Janus C
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):925-31. PubMed ID: 24726589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of the restorative procedure factors on stress values in premolar with MOD cavity: a finite element study.
Kantardžić I; Vasiljević D; Lužanin O; Maravić T; Blažić L
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Oct; 56(10):1875-1886. PubMed ID: 29633113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of cavity design preparation on stress values in maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.
Kantardzić I; Vasiljević D; Blazić L; Luzanin O
Croat Med J; 2012 Dec; 53(6):568-76. PubMed ID: 23275322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
Magne P
Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adhesive class I restorations in sound molar teeth incorporating combined resin-composite and glass ionomer materials: CAD-FE modeling and analysis.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Di Rienzo A; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1514-1522. PubMed ID: 31395448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
