These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34689059)

  • 1. Scientific realism and empirical confirmation: A puzzle.
    Allzén S
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Dec; 90():153-159. PubMed ID: 34689059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Against methodological continuity and metaphysical knowledge.
    Allzén S
    Eur J Philos Sci; 2023; 13(1):5. PubMed ID: 36643734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cosmological realism.
    Merritt D
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Aug; 88():193-208. PubMed ID: 34218160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific Realism and the Patent System.
    Resnik DB
    J Gen Philos Sci; 2016 Apr; 47(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 32231415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolutionary arguments against moral realism: Why the empirical details matter (and which ones do).
    Hopster J
    Biol Philos; 2018; 33(5):41. PubMed ID: 30595612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positioning positivism, critical realism and social constructionism in the health sciences: a philosophical orientation.
    Cruickshank J
    Nurs Inq; 2012 Mar; 19(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 22212371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The methodological defense of realism scrutinized.
    Wray KB
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2015 Dec; 54():74-9. PubMed ID: 26568089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Realism in evidence based medicine: interpreting the randomised controlled trial.
    Connelly J
    J Health Organ Manag; 2004; 18(2-3):70-81. PubMed ID: 15366275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expanding the use of empiricism in nursing: can we bridge the gap between knowledge and clinical practice?
    Giuliano KK
    Nurs Philos; 2003 Apr; 4(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 14498967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific realism, scientific practice, and science communication: An empirical investigation of academics and science communicators.
    Pils R; Schoenegger P
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2024 Jun; 105():85-98. PubMed ID: 38754361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consciousness and inference to the best explanation: Compiling empirical evidence supporting the access-phenomenal distinction and the overflow hypothesis.
    Kirkeby-Hinrup A; Fazekas P
    Conscious Cogn; 2021 Sep; 94():103173. PubMed ID: 34371465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Defending the selective confirmation strategy.
    Onishi Y
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2017 Aug; 64():1-10. PubMed ID: 29042017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Did Ptolemy make novel predictions? Launching Ptolemaic astronomy into the scientific realism debate.
    Carman C; Díez J
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2015 Aug; 52():20-34. PubMed ID: 26193785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some Contributions From The Scientific Realism of Evandro Agazzi to Discursive Social Psychology.
    Rengifo-Castañeda CA; Ossa JC; Millán JD; Cañaveral-Londoño DC; Cudina JN; Salas G
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2023 Mar; 57(1):273-291. PubMed ID: 35945410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Must Metaethical Realism Make a Semantic Claim?
    Kahane G
    J Moral Philos; 2013 Feb; 10(2):148-178. PubMed ID: 23525148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What counts as relevant criticism? Longino's critical contextual empiricism and the feminist criticism of mainstream economics.
    Lari T
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2024 Apr; 104():88-97. PubMed ID: 38493739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shifting loyalties: reconsidering psychology's subject matter.
    Beckstead Z
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2009 Sep; 43(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 19568821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Realism, reliability, and epistemic possibility: on modally interpreting the Benacerraf-Field challenge.
    Topey B
    Synthese; 2021; 199(1-2):4415-4436. PubMed ID: 34866667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should scientific realists embrace theoretical conservatism?
    Dellsén F
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2019 Aug; 76():30-38. PubMed ID: 31558207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The probabilistic no miracles argument.
    Sprenger J
    Eur J Philos Sci; 2016; 6():173-189. PubMed ID: 27512523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.