158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34689069)
1. Electrical impedance guides electrode array in cochlear implantation using machine learning and robotic feeder.
Hafeez N; Du X; Boulgouris N; Begg P; Irving R; Coulson C; Tourrel G
Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 412():108371. PubMed ID: 34689069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic pullback technique of a precurved cochlear-implant electrode array using real-time impedance sensing feedback.
Riojas KE; Bruns TL; Granna J; Webster RJ; Labadie RF
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2023 Mar; 18(3):413-421. PubMed ID: 36331796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atraumatic Insertion of a Cochlear Implant Pre-Curved Electrode Array by a Robot-Automated Alignment with the Coiling Direction of the Scala Tympani.
Torres R; Hochet B; Daoudi H; Carré F; Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y
Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 34284383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An optically-guided cochlear implant sheath for real-time monitoring of electrode insertion into the human cochlea.
Starovoyt A; Quirk BC; Putzeys T; Kerckhofs G; Nuyts J; Wouters J; McLaughlin RA; Verhaert N
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19234. PubMed ID: 36357503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of Translocation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays by Intracochlear Impedance Measurements.
Dong Y; Briaire JJ; Siebrecht M; Stronks HC; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 33974777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes.
Wanna GB; Noble JH; Carlson ML; Gifford RH; Dietrich MS; Haynes DS; Dawant BM; Labadie RF
Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov; 124 Suppl 6(0 6):S1-7. PubMed ID: 24764083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of Automated Tool for Electrode Array Insertion and its Study on Intracochlear Pressure.
Zagabathuni A; Padi KK; Kameswaran M; Subramani K
Laryngoscope; 2024 Mar; 134(3):1388-1395. PubMed ID: 37584398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of modiolar proximity through bipolar impedance measurements.
Pile J; Sweeney AD; Kumar S; Simaan N; Wanna GB
Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 27557458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multichannel cochlear implantation in the scala vestibuli.
Lin K; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 16788421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prolonged Insertion Time Reduces Translocation Rate of a Precurved Electrode Array in Cochlear Implantation.
van der Jagt AMA; Briaire JJ; Boehringer S; Verbist BM; Frijns JHM
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Apr; 43(4):e427-e434. PubMed ID: 35213473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-Vitro Study of Speed and Alignment Angle in Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertions.
Aebischer P; Mantokoudis G; Weder S; Anschuetz L; Caversaccio M; Wimmer W
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Jan; 69(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 34110987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Towards inferring positioning of straight cochlear-implant electrode arrays during insertion using real-time impedance sensing.
Riojas KE; Bruns TL; Granna J; Smetak MR; Labadie RF; Webster RJ
Int J Med Robot; 2024 Feb; 20(1):e2609. PubMed ID: 38536718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Impedance of cochlear implant electrode array in scalae tympani].
Du Q; Wang ZM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(46):3302-4. PubMed ID: 19159560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inroads toward robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery using steerable electrode arrays.
Zhang J; Wei W; Ding J; Roland JT; Manolidis S; Simaan N
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Oct; 31(8):1199-206. PubMed ID: 20864880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomically and mechanically accurate scala tympani model for electrode insertion studies.
Starovoyt A; Shaheen E; Putzeys T; Kerckhofs G; Politis C; Wouters J; Verhaert N
Hear Res; 2023 Mar; 430():108707. PubMed ID: 36773540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in the impedance of cochlear implant devices within 24 hours of their implantation.
Lin DP; Chen JK; Tung TH; Li LP
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222711. PubMed ID: 31536550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Real-Time Localization of Cochlear-Implant Electrode Arrays Using Bipolar Impedance Sensing.
Bruns TL; Riojas KE; Labadie RF; Webster Iii RJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Feb; 69(2):718-724. PubMed ID: 34379586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrode array-eluted dexamethasone protects against electrode insertion trauma induced hearing and hair cell losses, damage to neural elements, increases in impedance and fibrosis: A dose response study.
Bas E; Bohorquez J; Goncalves S; Perez E; Dinh CT; Garnham C; Hessler R; Eshraghi AA; Van De Water TR
Hear Res; 2016 Jul; 337():12-24. PubMed ID: 26892906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
