These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34692604)
1. Expanding Neonatal Bloodspot Screening: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective. van Dijk T; Kater A; Jansen M; Dondorp WJ; Blom M; Kemp S; Langeveld M; Cornel MC; van der Pal SM; Henneman L Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():706394. PubMed ID: 34692604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parents' Perspectives and Societal Acceptance of Implementation of Newborn Screening for SCID in the Netherlands. Blom M; Bredius RGM; Jansen ME; Weijman G; Kemper EA; Vermont CL; Hollink IHIM; Dik WA; van Montfrans JM; van Gijn ME; Henriet SS; van Aerde KJ; Koole W; Lankester AC; Dekkers EHBM; Schielen PCJI; de Vries MC; Henneman L; van der Burg M; J Clin Immunol; 2021 Jan; 41(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 33070266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Expanded Neonatal Bloodspot Screening Programmes: An Evaluation Framework to Discuss New Conditions With Stakeholders. Jansen ME; Klein AW; Buitenhuis EC; Rodenburg W; Cornel MC Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():635353. PubMed ID: 33692977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parents' views on accepting, declining, and expanding newborn bloodspot screening. van der Pal SM; Wins S; Klapwijk JE; van Dijk T; Kater-Kuipers A; van der Ploeg CPB; Jans SMPJ; Kemp S; Verschoof-Puite RK; van den Bosch LJM; Henneman L PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272585. PubMed ID: 35980961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stakeholder attitudes towards the role and application of informed consent for newborn bloodspot screening: a study protocol. Nicholls SG; Tessier L; Etchegary H; Brehaut JC; Potter BK; Hayeems RZ; Chakraborty P; Marcadier J; Milburn J; Pullman D; Turner L; Wilson BJ BMJ Open; 2014 Nov; 4(11):e006782. PubMed ID: 25421341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Provision of information about newborn screening antenatally: a sequential exploratory mixed-methods project. Ulph F; Wright S; Dharni N; Payne K; Bennett R; Roberts S; Walshe K; Lavender T Health Technol Assess; 2017 Oct; 21(55):1-240. PubMed ID: 28967862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neonatal and carrier screening for rare diseases: how innovation challenges screening criteria worldwide. Cornel MC; Rigter T; Jansen ME; Henneman L J Community Genet; 2021 Apr; 12(2):257-265. PubMed ID: 33074550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consent for newborn screening: parents' and health-care professionals' experiences of consent in practice. Etchegary H; Nicholls SG; Tessier L; Simmonds C; Potter BK; Brehaut JC; Pullman D; Hayeems R; Zelenietz S; Lamoureux M; Milburn J; Turner L; Chakraborty P; Wilson B Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Nov; 24(11):1530-1534. PubMed ID: 27302842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fostering caring relationships: Suggestions to rethink liberal perspectives on the ethics of newborn screening. van der Burg S; Oerlemans A Bioethics; 2018 Mar; 32(3):171-183. PubMed ID: 29442381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parental Awareness, Knowledge, and Attitudes Regarding Current and Future Newborn Bloodspot Screening: The First Report from Thailand. Wilaiwongsathien K; Wattanasirichaigoon D; Rattanasiri S; Aonnuam C; Tangshewinsirikul C; Tim-Aroon T Int J Neonatal Screen; 2023 May; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 37218890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parental attitudes toward ethical and social issues surrounding the expansion of newborn screening using new technologies. Hasegawa LE; Fergus KA; Ojeda N; Au SM Public Health Genomics; 2011; 14(4-5):298-306. PubMed ID: 20689248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preparing newborn screening for the future: a collaborative stakeholder engagement exploring challenges and opportunities to modernizing the newborn screening system. Andrews SM; Porter KA; Bailey DB; Peay HL BMC Pediatr; 2022 Feb; 22(1):90. PubMed ID: 35151296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 'Integrating Ethics and Equity with Economics and Effectiveness for newborn screening in the genomic age: A qualitative study protocol of stakeholder perspectives. Kariyawasam DS; Scarfe J; Meagher C; Farrar MA; Bhattacharya K; Carter SM; Newson AJ; Otlowski M; Watson J; Millis N; Norris S PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0299336. PubMed ID: 38527031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychosocial Impact of a True-Positive, False-Positive, or Inconclusive Newborn Bloodspot Screening Result: A Questionnaire Study among Parents. van den Heuvel LM; van der Pal SM; Verschoof-Puite RK; Klapwijk JE; Elsinghorst E; Dekkers E; van der Ploeg CPB; Henneman L Int J Neonatal Screen; 2024 Mar; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 38535122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals. Kater-Kuipers A; Bunnik EM; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RJH BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Oct; 18(1):409. PubMed ID: 30340550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parental Views on Expanded Newborn Screening Using Whole-Genome Sequencing. Joseph G; Chen F; Harris-Wai J; Puck JM; Young C; Koenig BA Pediatrics; 2016 Jan; 137 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S36-46. PubMed ID: 26729702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Australian healthcare professionals' perspectives on the ethical and practical issues associated with genomic newborn screening. Cao M; Notini L; Ayres S; Vears DF J Genet Couns; 2023 Apr; 32(2):376-386. PubMed ID: 36245433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consent for newborn screening: the attitudes of health care providers. Miller FA; Hayeems RZ; Carroll JC; Wilson B; Little J; Allanson J; Bytautas JP; Paynter M; Christensen R; Chaktraborty P Public Health Genomics; 2010; 13(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 19776551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]