These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34693437)
1. [Clinical study of the effect of fixed Twin-block on adolescent skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion]. Ma XQ; Zhao N; Xiang F; Zhou ML; Qian WH Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2021 Aug; 30(4):414-418. PubMed ID: 34693437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects. Gao W; Li X; Bai Y Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of modified twin block appliance in growing Class II high angle cases: A cephalometric study. Jha K; Adhikari M F1000Res; 2022; 11():459. PubMed ID: 38680231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes. Marşan G Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Efficacy evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance and tooth extraction in skeletal Class II malocclusion]. Gong Y; Yu Q; Li PL; Wang HH; Wei B; Shen G Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2014 Oct; 23(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 25543606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Effect of Twin-block in adolescents with mandibular retrusion and normal anterior overjet]. Ma XQ; Lu W; Ye M; Xing YB; Qian WH; Zhang L Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2023 Aug; 32(4):422-427. PubMed ID: 38044739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Soft tissue angle evaluation of fixed Twin-Block appliance treatment and tooth extraction treatment in skeletal Class II malocclusion]. Gong Y; Li PL; Wang HH; Yu Q; Wei B; Shen G Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Feb; 25(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 27063315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages. Khoja A; Fida M; Shaikh A Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):73-84. PubMed ID: 27409656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A cephalometric study on Twin-block appliance for treatment of early skeletal Class II malocclusion]. Liu Y; Liu YH Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Dec; 14(6):569-72. PubMed ID: 16400480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does mandibular advancement with clear aligners have the same skeletal and dentoalveolar effects as traditional functional appliances? Wu Y; Yu Q; Xia Y; Wang B; Chen S; Gu K; Zhang B; Zhu M BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):65. PubMed ID: 36732724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study. Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the effects of rapid maxillary expansion versus Twin Block appliance on mandibular growth in skeletal Class II patients. Zhang JN; Chen S; Huang CY; Zhong C; Jin J; Yu FY; Zhang ZZ; Lu HP BMC Oral Health; 2020 Dec; 20(1):350. PubMed ID: 33261594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of combined maxillary pad movable appliance and FR-III functional appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion of deciduous teeth. Lyu L; Lin H; Huang H BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):485. PubMed ID: 36368985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of changes in the airway dimensions following the treatment of Class II malocclusion patients with the twin-block and Seifi appliances. Tahmasbi S; Seifi M; Soleymani AA; Mohamadian F; Alam M Dent Med Probl; 2023; 60(2):247-254. PubMed ID: 37382051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of conventional and skeletal anchorage system supported fixed functional appliance on maxillo-mandibular complex and temporomandibular joint: A preliminary comparative cone beam computed tomography study. Gandedkar NH; Shrikantaiah S; Patil AK; Baseer MA; Chng CK; Ganeshkar SV; Kambalyal P Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):256-268. PubMed ID: 31023589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the MARA appliance on the position of the lower anteriors in children, adolescents and adults with Class II malocclusion. Gönner U; Ozkan V; Jahn E; Toll DE J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Sep; 68(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 17882366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance. Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Therapeutic evaluation of the correction of the severe bi-maxillary protrusion cases by Tweed-Merrifield technique]. Huang JQ; Liu SY; Jiang JH Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Jun; 48(3):555-61. PubMed ID: 27318924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study. Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]